[TonyLima]

Stanford 28  Colgate 17. 

We'll probably hear the usual "We didn't want to reveal too much of the playbook" afterwards. McKee will probably be able to pass on Colgate fairly easily but how good our running game will be against the Raiders is unclear. Frankly, it's pathetic that Stanford put weakling Colgate on its schedule. That seems a trend at Stanford, including basketball's propensity for putting a lot of games against marshmallows on the pre-conference schedule. Why not play Menlo College next year? That might be more of a challenge than Colgate.

Say what you will about Stanford football; but they cannot be accused of playing weak schedules. Year in and year out they play one of the toughest schedules in the country. They seldom play a cookie. So I have no problem with this one

Colgate? COLGATE?

[TonyLima]

Stanford 28  Colgate 17. 

We'll probably hear the usual "We didn't want to reveal too much of the playbook" afterwards. McKee will probably be able to pass on Colgate fairly easily but how good our running game will be against the Raiders is unclear. Frankly, it's pathetic that Stanford put weakling Colgate on its schedule. That seems a trend at Stanford, including basketball's propensity for putting a lot of games against marshmallows on the pre-conference schedule. Why not play Menlo College next year? That might be more of a challenge than Colgate.

Say what you will about Stanford football; but they cannot be accused of playing weak schedules. Year in and year out they play one of the toughest schedules in the country. They seldom play a cookie. So I have no problem with this one

Colgate? COLGATE?