05-06-2022, 06:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-06-2022, 06:28 PM by BostonCard.)
My guess is that the the US is slowly “boiling the frog” about its involvement in the war. Had something like this been disclosed at the outset, Russia would have had a sh#rift about us directly helping a combatant. However, by slowly upping the ante, it makes it very difficult for Russia to respond, since we slowly push the “lines” out. I think the goal is to expand the space for US intervention in the conflict.
At some point, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is leaked out that we have “advisors” in Ukraine.
BC
Well, I mean, the United States has property rights and due process enshrined in the fifth amendment of the US constitution. And under international law, a foreign power’s property is immune from seizure, not that Russia seemed to give a lick about international law when, for example, it seized and annexed Crimea, let alone in this war.
I don’t think what you propose is possible under current understandings of US and international law, though interpretations can sometimes change under extreme circumstances.
BC
At some point, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is leaked out that we have “advisors” in Ukraine.
BC
(05-06-2022, 06:18 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: [tweet]https://twitter.com/pevchikh/status/1522682826222706689[/tweet]
How long until the seized Russian assets are sold or scrapped for money to fund Ukraine? I know there are "legal" issues around how to do this, but I don't see how countries can't just declare Russia an enemy of the state and make it legal to seize, auction or liquidate assets from any citizen of that country.
Well, I mean, the United States has property rights and due process enshrined in the fifth amendment of the US constitution. And under international law, a foreign power’s property is immune from seizure, not that Russia seemed to give a lick about international law when, for example, it seized and annexed Crimea, let alone in this war.
I don’t think what you propose is possible under current understandings of US and international law, though interpretations can sometimes change under extreme circumstances.
BC
