10-12-2021, 09:59 AM
The issue for me wasn't whether or not Biggins is a UCLA fan, it was whether he has pro-UCLA or anti-USC bias in his work. I don't read everything he writes, but I don't detect homer-ism in his free articles. Maybe it shows up behind the paywall.
If anybody really cares, you can compare and contrast Biggins' free-of-charge interviews with David Bailey here:
Stanford--https://247sports.com/Article/David-Bail...167180788/
UCLA--https://247sports.com/Article/david-bail...172944879/
USC and UCLA--https://247sports.com/Article/ucla-bruin...170417459/
If anybody really cares, you can compare and contrast Biggins' free-of-charge interviews with David Bailey here:
Stanford--https://247sports.com/Article/David-Bail...167180788/
UCLA--https://247sports.com/Article/david-bail...172944879/
USC and UCLA--https://247sports.com/Article/ucla-bruin...170417459/
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)