(07-04-2021, 11:06 PM)teejers1 Wrote:(07-04-2021, 04:22 PM)Phogge Wrote: Hey Teejers if Slater hadn't gone to Stanford would you feel the same way?
I obviously root for him more because he went to Stanford (Belt did not, though, and I defend him pretty vigorously in these parts, too).
The thing about Slater is (a) he has the athleticism/tools to be an excellent defensive player - he is now merely good on D, and (b) he has an electric bat - his bat speed generates more power than you'd expect just looking at the guy (including RC field gap power). I'm partial to those attributes . . . which is also why the Estrada (I'm just going to call him "Erik") kid looks very intriguing.
Slater is a right handed version of Nate Schierholtz. Both are/were certainly good enough to play in the big leagues but neither is/was good enough to be a regular in the starting lineup. There is no shame in being a platoon guy. Heck, when he is on, Slater is rock solid v. left handers (against lefties, his OPS is .185 better than v. right-handers).
Career:
Slater 831 PA, 22 HR, .246 BA and .717 OPS
Schierholtz 1316 PA, 23 HR, .270 BA and .729 OPS (as a Giant)
