[BostonCard]

I may have misread OF's post.  I read his post as asking whether the door #1 comment was a safe assumption. (yes)  I apologize if that is not what you were asking, OF.

Whether his own assumption (that Stanford should have more commits by now) is safe, I will defer to the expert here.  I will note that the median number of commits in the Pac-12 is 5.5, the lowest (Utah) is 1, and Stanford is 11th in the Pac-12 in number of commits.  And/but Stanford is usually near the bottom at this point in the cycle, so this is not unusual.  Whether it should be, OTOH, is a different story.

BC

[BostonCard]

I may have misread OF's post.  I read his post as asking whether the door #1 comment was a safe assumption. (yes)  I apologize if that is not what you were asking, OF.

Whether his own assumption (that Stanford should have more commits by now) is safe, I will defer to the expert here.  I will note that the median number of commits in the Pac-12 is 5.5, the lowest (Utah) is 1, and Stanford is 11th in the Pac-12 in number of commits.  And/but Stanford is usually near the bottom at this point in the cycle, so this is not unusual.  Whether it should be, OTOH, is a different story.

BC