12-19-2020, 09:14 PM
Just to remind anyone who hadn't noticed. Monday's game is at NOON.
Stanford met a few things today they hadn't seen yet. A defense that could disrupt them. A good offensive player they couldn't shutdown 1 on 1. A big post.
The score was more representative of where I think Stanford is. For appearances sake, I'm glad it was 20 pts. I was thinking it would be more like 15 or 13.
We had a lot of passes deflected, or not attempted because a defender was in the way. Shots were getting contested.
We mostly kept our offense going. Great passing for the most part.
Like the previous game, the 2nd quarter was our weakest.
Of our 42 misses that became rebounds, we got 20; USC got 22. Impressive. Too bad there were so many misses.
USC had a better FG% and 3PT%. But we led the FT%. We didn't really defend well enough.
It will be a tougher game at their place.
By the way, IIRC, if a players foot is on or above the arc, the player is in the restricted zone. It doesn't have to be touching the floor.
Stanford met a few things today they hadn't seen yet. A defense that could disrupt them. A good offensive player they couldn't shutdown 1 on 1. A big post.
The score was more representative of where I think Stanford is. For appearances sake, I'm glad it was 20 pts. I was thinking it would be more like 15 or 13.
We had a lot of passes deflected, or not attempted because a defender was in the way. Shots were getting contested.
We mostly kept our offense going. Great passing for the most part.
Like the previous game, the 2nd quarter was our weakest.
Of our 42 misses that became rebounds, we got 20; USC got 22. Impressive. Too bad there were so many misses.
USC had a better FG% and 3PT%. But we led the FT%. We didn't really defend well enough.
It will be a tougher game at their place.
By the way, IIRC, if a players foot is on or above the arc, the player is in the restricted zone. It doesn't have to be touching the floor.