[81alum]

We're going off tangent a bit, but the USSC decision focused specifically on religious services because they are protected by the first amendment and there are religious liberty concerns if a state or local government restricts church services but not analogous secular events.

That being said, we should be shutting down all indoor restaurant service, unfortunately (and "outdoor" service that is, for all intents and purposes, indoors because it is in an "outdoor" tent).

BC

Not that it would matter, but is all of Maples really indoors?  The concourse area with the concessions is technically open to the sky, even though the overhangs prevent the elements from getting in.

Of course, the games are not played on the concourse.  And it doesn't sound like it would matter if they found a way to play the games outdoors anyway, as far as SCC is concerned.

[81alum]

We're going off tangent a bit, but the USSC decision focused specifically on religious services because they are protected by the first amendment and there are religious liberty concerns if a state or local government restricts church services but not analogous secular events.

That being said, we should be shutting down all indoor restaurant service, unfortunately (and "outdoor" service that is, for all intents and purposes, indoors because it is in an "outdoor" tent).

BC

Not that it would matter, but is all of Maples really indoors?  The concourse area with the concessions is technically open to the sky, even though the overhangs prevent the elements from getting in.

Of course, the games are not played on the concourse.  And it doesn't sound like it would matter if they found a way to play the games outdoors anyway, as far as SCC is concerned.