[teejers1]

Could have released the audio in Feb, doubt it would have changed anything besides being a headline for a day or two.

Probably not, but that shouldn't have been Woodward's call.

BC

Well, except it would have changed 2006's ability to hold the omission against him like he does above.  Indeed, I'd argue that for practical purposes (i.e., November), not disclosing this immediately makes all the difference.  C'mon now . . . 

P.S.  What makes it Woodward's call to disclose now versus back in February?

[teejers1]

Could have released the audio in Feb, doubt it would have changed anything besides being a headline for a day or two.

Probably not, but that shouldn't have been Woodward's call.

BC

Well, except it would have changed 2006's ability to hold the omission against him like he does above.  Indeed, I'd argue that for practical purposes (i.e., November), not disclosing this immediately makes all the difference.  C'mon now . . . 

P.S.  What makes it Woodward's call to disclose now versus back in February?