[Spiny_Norman]

I cannot recall seeing a single play with Stanford in the new 3-4 defense.  Keiser and Thomas were down linemen most of the time.  I think the base defense was a 4-2-5 with Michael Thomas as the 5th DB.  Yet even with 5 DBs, Sac State found holes in the secondary.  But the tackling after a reception was pretty sure.  Sac State had few yards after catch.

I don\'t think you can draw many inferences from this game at least wrt the defense.  It seems that the coaches held back a lot, perhaps to give UCLA less information to use in preparation for this week.

If the game\'s participation report is accurate, the following true frosh played:
Ed Reynolds
Barry Browning
Anthony Wilkerson

[Spiny_Norman]

I cannot recall seeing a single play with Stanford in the new 3-4 defense.  Keiser and Thomas were down linemen most of the time.  I think the base defense was a 4-2-5 with Michael Thomas as the 5th DB.  Yet even with 5 DBs, Sac State found holes in the secondary.  But the tackling after a reception was pretty sure.  Sac State had few yards after catch.

I don\'t think you can draw many inferences from this game at least wrt the defense.  It seems that the coaches held back a lot, perhaps to give UCLA less information to use in preparation for this week.

If the game\'s participation report is accurate, the following true frosh played:
Ed Reynolds
Barry Browning
Anthony Wilkerson