They've quietly updated the Santa Clara preprint. Unsurprisingly, the revised estimates are much less headline-grabbing:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/spence_jeffrey_/status/1256008621017554944?s=20[/tweet]
Strangely, the updated preprint still does not address the fact that there were "rogue" recruitment methods that may have influenced the participation pool beyond the parameters envisioned.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/spence_jeffrey_/status/1256008621017554944?s=20[/tweet]
Strangely, the updated preprint still does not address the fact that there were "rogue" recruitment methods that may have influenced the participation pool beyond the parameters envisioned.