(04-29-2020, 07:49 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Most unrestrained passengers involved in motor vehicle collisions survive too. So no need to wear a seatbelt?
BC
Interesting. You're equating wearing seatbelts with throwing 30 million people out of work and stopping the American economy in its tracks. Okay...
BTW, your comment is not strictly true. Nearly 20,000 people wearing seatbelts died in car crashes last year, according to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. Perhaps you could alter your retort to say "Most pedestrians weren't killed in car crashes" but that wouldn't be right either as 5,977 pedestrians died in car crashes. So I suppose the real point is if you want to get anywhere, you still face risks, unless you Shelter in Place. Which is cool as long as you don't need paychecks, money, food or rent.
(04-29-2020, 07:39 PM)dabigv13 Wrote: We get it. You two DGAF. You can go golfing now, brighten up.
As M T once said to me, please don't put words in our mouths. Neither of us said or implied we DGAF. It's the choice between two miserable options. I side with the one that doesn't ruin the economy because, as you say, IGAF about the 30 million out of work and the 60 million who depend on them for their livelihood in one way or another.
BTW, next week I need to furlough five more of my team members bring the headcount cuts to 23% of my team. I also had to cut another 30% out of my budget, now 70% below the meager amount that they provided me with in the first place.
And incidentally...I wouldn't say you DGAF, because I'm not an asshole. And I haven't played golf in decades.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
