04-23-2020, 05:33 AM
What are the odds Stanford's brass demands an investigation into what happened?
I understand the "book burning" angst, and the Stanford bias (not favoring, but holding it to the highest standards not met in this case). At the same time, there is a real possibility of purposeful fraud here. I'm not saying there was, but given all the factors involved that we know about, transparency is the best disinfectant. Maybe it was innocent mistakes. Maybe there was something nefarious. All I know is something is not right with this situation and it needs to be cleared up, to protect the brand.
Personally, I don't knock Stanford for the Theranos debacle, but it certainly doesn't help in terms of benefits of doubts. It's time to remove all doubts and get to the absolute truth.
I understand the "book burning" angst, and the Stanford bias (not favoring, but holding it to the highest standards not met in this case). At the same time, there is a real possibility of purposeful fraud here. I'm not saying there was, but given all the factors involved that we know about, transparency is the best disinfectant. Maybe it was innocent mistakes. Maybe there was something nefarious. All I know is something is not right with this situation and it needs to be cleared up, to protect the brand.
Personally, I don't knock Stanford for the Theranos debacle, but it certainly doesn't help in terms of benefits of doubts. It's time to remove all doubts and get to the absolute truth.