[BostonCard]

Cornfed, should you, BC, or I turn out the lights as the last fans to leave?  (I'm assuming you actually go to the games).  Whoever it is, go ahead and say "ka-BOOM!" as you're flipping the switch - it might make you feel better.

Let’s stop with the hyperbole.  I think when you spout such ridiculousness you undermine your case for making more substantive arguments that are worth debating.

Stanford football survived the Buddy and Walt years, a time when a significiant fraction of fans wondered aloud whether we should leave Div I football.  For all your complaints, Stanford football under Shaw is much more successful and exciting than back in the days of the shotgun draw behind a crap OL and quick-kicking on third down.

I have questions about the long term (50-plus year) viability of college football generally and Stanford football specifically.  Those questions have nothing to do with Shaw, our perceived offensive inadequacies, or the possibility that we might lose some games this year.

BC

[BostonCard]

Cornfed, should you, BC, or I turn out the lights as the last fans to leave?  (I'm assuming you actually go to the games).  Whoever it is, go ahead and say "ka-BOOM!" as you're flipping the switch - it might make you feel better.

Let’s stop with the hyperbole.  I think when you spout such ridiculousness you undermine your case for making more substantive arguments that are worth debating.

Stanford football survived the Buddy and Walt years, a time when a significiant fraction of fans wondered aloud whether we should leave Div I football.  For all your complaints, Stanford football under Shaw is much more successful and exciting than back in the days of the shotgun draw behind a crap OL and quick-kicking on third down.

I have questions about the long term (50-plus year) viability of college football generally and Stanford football specifically.  Those questions have nothing to do with Shaw, our perceived offensive inadequacies, or the possibility that we might lose some games this year.

BC