10-25-2017, 07:50 PM
(10-25-2017, 05:41 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=eric link=topic=17781.msg207833#msg207833 date=1508972199]
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17781.msg207831#msg207831 date=1508971164]
Happy to see Tara among the top 5, and appropriately paid more than Dawkins (who wasnt in the top 5). She deserves it!
BC
in the FY14 report
http://bondholder-information.stanford.e...0_FY14.pdf
Dawkins was paid $1.8m (see page 84)
[/quote]
Shaw went from $2.2m in FY14 to $5m in FY15.Â
Tara was not in the FY14 document (so less than $1.1m, which was the salary of the 5th most compensated employee) to making almost $2.3m.
Someone loosened the purse strings. Both coaches deserve it as one of the top 5 coaches in their respective sports.
I wonder if Tara is the highest paid female coach in the country.
BC
[/quote]
Do they list bonuses separately? I suspect purse strings are part of it, but it could be bonus payouts. I'd be really quite surprised if winning the Rose Bowl doesn't net Shaw a pretty penny, (though I guess that wasn't a particularly good season for Tara so I dunno).