[cardcrimson]

[quote author=Extra Point link=topic=11701.msg186629#msg186629 date=1484598765]
[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg186592#msg186592 date=1484580873]
I think we are making the assumption that coaches pay a lot of attention to rankings when they decide who to recruit. Shaw says he pays none.

It is the other way around. The people who give out star ratings rely heavily on the number and quality of the recruits' scholarships. When the stars for a recruit are lower or higher than expected, it is because these "experts" are reluctant to make big deviations from their initial assessment.
[/quote]

Right. That's how a 4 star becomes a 5 star when they commit to Bama. It's not because the services want to make Bama look good, it's because Saban has earned the benefit of the doubt.
[/quote]

Is that why some of our guys seem to be dropping in the rankings. At one point, we had two of the top four according to Rivals. . . .

[cardcrimson]

[quote author=Extra Point link=topic=11701.msg186629#msg186629 date=1484598765]
[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg186592#msg186592 date=1484580873]
I think we are making the assumption that coaches pay a lot of attention to rankings when they decide who to recruit. Shaw says he pays none.

It is the other way around. The people who give out star ratings rely heavily on the number and quality of the recruits' scholarships. When the stars for a recruit are lower or higher than expected, it is because these "experts" are reluctant to make big deviations from their initial assessment.
[/quote]

Right. That's how a 4 star becomes a 5 star when they commit to Bama. It's not because the services want to make Bama look good, it's because Saban has earned the benefit of the doubt.
[/quote]

Is that why some of our guys seem to be dropping in the rankings. At one point, we had two of the top four according to Rivals. . . .