[jayasena]

I would think the appropriate peer group for Wilner are the other voters, not the computers. And in that peer group he certainly seems to be an outlier in terms of where he ranks Stanford.

Of course, I've always thought Wilner was just a fairly sophisticated bot that scans sports forums, twitter feed etc. and culls random bits for his own blog/articles rather than a human who creates original content. So maybe Garvin is onto something after all  ;)

[jayasena]

I would think the appropriate peer group for Wilner are the other voters, not the computers. And in that peer group he certainly seems to be an outlier in terms of where he ranks Stanford.

Of course, I've always thought Wilner was just a fairly sophisticated bot that scans sports forums, twitter feed etc. and culls random bits for his own blog/articles rather than a human who creates original content. So maybe Garvin is onto something after all  ;)