[yvonne]

I'm glad that Wilner has nothing to do with the BCS rankings because if he did, he would do whatever he could to lower it, and yes, he would claim that losses by SEC teams above us were "quality losses" and would continue to rate us lower than them. And yes, when one person rates us lower than the rest of the nation EVERY.SINGLE.WEEK, that person's bias is more than "supposed." As for reading his column, I'm not giving him the page views.

The real joy is in the games, and nothing any writer says is going to take away those 65 points, 613 total yards, and more than 400 yards rushing.

[yvonne]

I'm glad that Wilner has nothing to do with the BCS rankings because if he did, he would do whatever he could to lower it, and yes, he would claim that losses by SEC teams above us were "quality losses" and would continue to rate us lower than them. And yes, when one person rates us lower than the rest of the nation EVERY.SINGLE.WEEK, that person's bias is more than "supposed." As for reading his column, I'm not giving him the page views.

The real joy is in the games, and nothing any writer says is going to take away those 65 points, 613 total yards, and more than 400 yards rushing.