[CTcard]

[quote author=terry link=topic=15706.msg171936#msg171936 date=1474313692]
Getting back to McCaffrey -- Looking at the box score for the U*S*C game, I just noticed that McCaffrey's stats were revised. Apparently, there was a 7-yard gain by McCaffrey that was originally recorded as a reception but was reclassified as a rushing attempt. McCaffrey now is credited with 31 carries for 172 yards and 3 catches for 66 yards. Stanford as a team now is credited with 302 rushing yards against U*S*C.

Regardless, he is still the top rusher and top receiver in the game, for either team!
[/quote]

I think not quite.

Tyler Petite, the backup U$C TE had 73 yards receiving, which included two long receptions - including the one on 3rd and 18. McCaffrey would have tied him in receiving yards with those 7 yards in the receiving column.

[CTcard]

[quote author=terry link=topic=15706.msg171936#msg171936 date=1474313692]
Getting back to McCaffrey -- Looking at the box score for the U*S*C game, I just noticed that McCaffrey's stats were revised. Apparently, there was a 7-yard gain by McCaffrey that was originally recorded as a reception but was reclassified as a rushing attempt. McCaffrey now is credited with 31 carries for 172 yards and 3 catches for 66 yards. Stanford as a team now is credited with 302 rushing yards against U*S*C.

Regardless, he is still the top rusher and top receiver in the game, for either team!
[/quote]

I think not quite.

Tyler Petite, the backup U$C TE had 73 yards receiving, which included two long receptions - including the one on 3rd and 18. McCaffrey would have tied him in receiving yards with those 7 yards in the receiving column.