[Mick]

I like Sagarin's win50 metric, which is, "the rating required to win 50% of the games if playing an infinite number of round-robins in the given group at a neutral location."  Especially since all conferences play a round robin within their division.  For the P12N, it is 79.21, which corresponds to roughly the rating that #33 ranked Texas has.  With the caveat that Sagarin doesn't have enough data points to "connect" the teams (and thus still relies a bit on pre-season priors), the P12N teams are:
#3 Stanford 92.37 (predictor)
#8 Washington 87.16
#36 Oregon 76.99
#41 WSU 77.30
#53 ןɐɔ 74.23
#77 Oregon State 67.14

Stanford, Washington, and Oregon seem about right.  ןɐɔ and WSU are probably swapped.  Oregon State is probably about right.

BC

And just for fun, predictors for the South:

#14 UCLA, 84.68
#25 Southern Cal, 81.86
#37 Utah, 77.98
#43 Colorado, 77.44
#47 Arizona State, 75.81
#70 Arizona, 68.53

[Mick]

I like Sagarin's win50 metric, which is, "the rating required to win 50% of the games if playing an infinite number of round-robins in the given group at a neutral location."  Especially since all conferences play a round robin within their division.  For the P12N, it is 79.21, which corresponds to roughly the rating that #33 ranked Texas has.  With the caveat that Sagarin doesn't have enough data points to "connect" the teams (and thus still relies a bit on pre-season priors), the P12N teams are:
#3 Stanford 92.37 (predictor)
#8 Washington 87.16
#36 Oregon 76.99
#41 WSU 77.30
#53 ןɐɔ 74.23
#77 Oregon State 67.14

Stanford, Washington, and Oregon seem about right.  ןɐɔ and WSU are probably swapped.  Oregon State is probably about right.

BC

And just for fun, predictors for the South:

#14 UCLA, 84.68
#25 Southern Cal, 81.86
#37 Utah, 77.98
#43 Colorado, 77.44
#47 Arizona State, 75.81
#70 Arizona, 68.53