09-12-2011, 11:52 AM
Someone unfamiliar with Wilner might assume that part of his "extreme" ranking would be ranking Stanford at #2. He is a local guy and Stanford got placed at #2 by some. But no!!! Wilner's Stanford ranking was actually below the average.
Wilner's lack of Stanford love extended to his picks versus the spread as he was bold enough to predict that Stanford would not cover the spread in the games on the first two weeks.
FWIW - SJSU did look pretty solid against UCLA, so Wilner's SJSU love may not have been completely misplaced.
Wilner's lack of Stanford love extended to his picks versus the spread as he was bold enough to predict that Stanford would not cover the spread in the games on the first two weeks.
FWIW - SJSU did look pretty solid against UCLA, so Wilner's SJSU love may not have been completely misplaced.