[ColoradoTree]

I know ESPN is rightly regarded as one of the weakest recruiting services, but I think it's interesting to note that they have Paxton Segina ranked as a 3-star recruit (79 rating, and the 89th-ranked WR in the class), while the other services agree that he's either a very low 3-star recruit or a 2-star guy. 

In fact, he's actually ranked HIGHER than Donald Stewart on ESPN, who gets a 77 rating (still 3 stars) and is pegged as the 122nd-ranked WR in the class.  Huh.

I'm certainly not saying that Segina is the better prospect than Stewart, but I was surprised to see ESPN rank him as such when the other services agree that Stewart is a 4-star caliber prospect while Segina is a 2-star (or very low 3-star) guy.  It could be as simple as "ESPN rankings are always weird" or perhaps one of their recruitniks saw the same thing in Segina that our coaching staff did. 

[ColoradoTree]

I know ESPN is rightly regarded as one of the weakest recruiting services, but I think it's interesting to note that they have Paxton Segina ranked as a 3-star recruit (79 rating, and the 89th-ranked WR in the class), while the other services agree that he's either a very low 3-star recruit or a 2-star guy. 

In fact, he's actually ranked HIGHER than Donald Stewart on ESPN, who gets a 77 rating (still 3 stars) and is pegged as the 122nd-ranked WR in the class.  Huh.

I'm certainly not saying that Segina is the better prospect than Stewart, but I was surprised to see ESPN rank him as such when the other services agree that Stewart is a 4-star caliber prospect while Segina is a 2-star (or very low 3-star) guy.  It could be as simple as "ESPN rankings are always weird" or perhaps one of their recruitniks saw the same thing in Segina that our coaching staff did.