11-29-2015, 01:49 AM
(Re 81alum (short post): Turnovers were lop-sided. You apparently misread our TOs. We had 20 (not 15) TO for which Dayton got 27 pts. They had 13 TO for which we got 15 pts
   81alum (main post): In the first half, as you said, Dayton hit 7 of 19 threes, while we hit 3 of 9. But I wouldn't characterize Dayton as "caught on fire from three" when they're hitting 36.8% to our 33.3%. Perhaps you were influenced by listening to the Dayton audio feed?
  Jskass: Kailee had a bit more playing time against Boston College last year.)
The game had a lot of bad and some good:
Bad: While we won, we confirmed we're not a top team this year. I suspect we're overranked at #13. We lead by more than 2 possessions for only 45 seconds. The game didn't turn out to be an acid test of Stanford vs a zone.
Good: We did come back from a 12 point deficit, to win by 8. We did this by playing better, not because the opponent had injuries or players in foul trouble.
Bad: another 20 turnover game (at least 3 on charges). Again, I believe most of these turnovers were not due to a faster pace, but just poor ball control.
Good: We did ok playing against taller girls (6'5": 23 min; 6'4": 21 min; 6'3": 18 min). We got 36.7% of the rebounds under our O board and 68.4% at the defensive end. (36.7+68.4=105.1. That means we got roughly 5% more rebounds than if the two teams were equal.)
Bad: Our turnovers shut down our offense for the first half. While both teams shot roughly the same (even after their streak of four 3s in a row at the end of the first half), Dayton was ahead because of more shots. Once again our turnovers were spread around (how else could you get 20 in a game?). Only Kailee had no turnovers while playing at least one minute!
Good: We did pretty well in shooting % in first half (FG: 52%, 3PT: 33%). In the second half, we bombed them from distance (44%, 53%)
Good: Our foul shooting wound up at 81%:Â 13 of 16.
Bad:Â After being frugal with fouls in the first half (4), we had a lot more fouls in the second half(10)
Good: Individual foul trouble didn't matter for us. Lili did wind up with 4 fouls, but the last one came right at the end of the game. Especially good, Alanna only had 2 fouls, both in the second half.
Interesting stat: Alanna had more points than minutes. (I haven't figured her out. I don't see the flashiness of an Ogwumike, nor the sheer aggressiveness of a Appel. But she is being effective.)
Kailee should be reminded that immediately putting back an offensive rebound is NOT what you want to do in the last minute or two, when leading by less than 2 possessions.
While I am glad to get the online streaming, it is frustrating for it to be about 4 frames per second, as you can't discern details such as fouls, travels, etc.
Play with the live stats. You do get some different ways of looking at things. For instance, go to Trends, and then choose Shooting/Turns Reference (and then Switch to Ascending). Unfortunately, for that screen, you can't distinguish two players with the same last name.
   81alum (main post): In the first half, as you said, Dayton hit 7 of 19 threes, while we hit 3 of 9. But I wouldn't characterize Dayton as "caught on fire from three" when they're hitting 36.8% to our 33.3%. Perhaps you were influenced by listening to the Dayton audio feed?
  Jskass: Kailee had a bit more playing time against Boston College last year.)
The game had a lot of bad and some good:
Bad: While we won, we confirmed we're not a top team this year. I suspect we're overranked at #13. We lead by more than 2 possessions for only 45 seconds. The game didn't turn out to be an acid test of Stanford vs a zone.
Good: We did come back from a 12 point deficit, to win by 8. We did this by playing better, not because the opponent had injuries or players in foul trouble.
Bad: another 20 turnover game (at least 3 on charges). Again, I believe most of these turnovers were not due to a faster pace, but just poor ball control.
Good: We did ok playing against taller girls (6'5": 23 min; 6'4": 21 min; 6'3": 18 min). We got 36.7% of the rebounds under our O board and 68.4% at the defensive end. (36.7+68.4=105.1. That means we got roughly 5% more rebounds than if the two teams were equal.)
Bad: Our turnovers shut down our offense for the first half. While both teams shot roughly the same (even after their streak of four 3s in a row at the end of the first half), Dayton was ahead because of more shots. Once again our turnovers were spread around (how else could you get 20 in a game?). Only Kailee had no turnovers while playing at least one minute!
Good: We did pretty well in shooting % in first half (FG: 52%, 3PT: 33%). In the second half, we bombed them from distance (44%, 53%)
Good: Our foul shooting wound up at 81%:Â 13 of 16.
Bad:Â After being frugal with fouls in the first half (4), we had a lot more fouls in the second half(10)
Good: Individual foul trouble didn't matter for us. Lili did wind up with 4 fouls, but the last one came right at the end of the game. Especially good, Alanna only had 2 fouls, both in the second half.
Interesting stat: Alanna had more points than minutes. (I haven't figured her out. I don't see the flashiness of an Ogwumike, nor the sheer aggressiveness of a Appel. But she is being effective.)
Kailee should be reminded that immediately putting back an offensive rebound is NOT what you want to do in the last minute or two, when leading by less than 2 possessions.
While I am glad to get the online streaming, it is frustrating for it to be about 4 frames per second, as you can't discern details such as fouls, travels, etc.
Play with the live stats. You do get some different ways of looking at things. For instance, go to Trends, and then choose Shooting/Turns Reference (and then Switch to Ascending). Unfortunately, for that screen, you can't distinguish two players with the same last name.