[winflop]

A week after Low APR U shot itself in the foot by trying too hard to pass, when the running game was going well, it's a little hard to be too disappointed with a running game that did reasonably well.  For most of the game, we had a pretty balanced attack.

BC

But why was there a need for that balanced an attack when running off tackle or between the tackles was racking up 4+ yards on almost every snap?  I would have liked about a 70/30 mix (60/40 at least) with more play action.

But that's way down the list of the reasons Stanford lost - along with the questionable decision to try a 45yd FG on 4th & 2.  Both way below the on-field execution errors

[winflop]

A week after Low APR U shot itself in the foot by trying too hard to pass, when the running game was going well, it's a little hard to be too disappointed with a running game that did reasonably well.  For most of the game, we had a pretty balanced attack.

BC

But why was there a need for that balanced an attack when running off tackle or between the tackles was racking up 4+ yards on almost every snap?  I would have liked about a 70/30 mix (60/40 at least) with more play action.

But that's way down the list of the reasons Stanford lost - along with the questionable decision to try a 45yd FG on 4th & 2.  Both way below the on-field execution errors