08-25-2015, 03:41 PM
(08-25-2015, 02:45 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=terry link=topic=12569.msg125525#msg125525 date=1440533350]
[quote author=CTcard link=topic=12569.msg125471#msg125471 date=1440512311]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=12569.msg125470#msg125470 date=1440511830]
Statistically-oriented projections seem to rate us higher.Â
Of course statistically oriented projections have no statistics from this year to base ranking upon.
[/quote]
Yep. I don't know why Sagarin and similar stat-based systems publish a pre-season ranking. Those systems don't work until there are some current numbers to feed into the algorithms.
For what it's worth, here's a compilation of various pre-season rankings. It includes 38 different ranking sources to date. Stanford's composite ranking is 16th, with a range of 5th to 37th. http://masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
[/quote]
Getting back to CTCard's point/question, a range of 5 - 37 seems imprecise, but maybe that is par for the course for a pre-season ranking.
BC
[/quote]
The #5 ranking comes from Brown True Sports (BTS) or Mike Brown. Has been comparing colleges since 1999, has a Texas helmet on his page:
http://www.brownstruesports.com/
He was a part time sportswriter, and a full time contract auditor. Perhaps not the best authority, though I appreciate the thought.
#37 is Dezenzio TSRS, and the link is a gambling site "Bustthebooks.com"
Audaces fortuna iuvat
