[washingtonismoney]

Has there really been much reluctance to blame Shaw?

I suppose it depends which boards and which posters one reads.

There has been a reluctance to follow through to the obvious implication: namely, if you (general you) really believe the criticisms you're making, why aren't you calling for Shaw to be fired? The general praise from the critic camp is that Shaw represents the university well, but it's hard (for me at least) to take this seriously as anything more than a minor virtue.

[washingtonismoney]

Has there really been much reluctance to blame Shaw?

I suppose it depends which boards and which posters one reads.

There has been a reluctance to follow through to the obvious implication: namely, if you (general you) really believe the criticisms you're making, why aren't you calling for Shaw to be fired? The general praise from the critic camp is that Shaw represents the university well, but it's hard (for me at least) to take this seriously as anything more than a minor virtue.