[Hank 91]

Not that it matters a great deal, but what's up with Williams being a 3 star and being dropped from the #36 to #41 DT on Rivals?  He dominated the Oakland camp, didn't he?  I thought he might get bumped up, but he actually has gone down in ranking there.


I don't think I've ever seen a 3 star recruit with the offer list Michael Williams has.  FWIW, 247 has him as the #23 DT and composite 4 star and Scout ranks him as the #14 DT and a 4 star.  Safe to assume Rivals will be getting its act together on Williams before long and he'll get bumped to 4 stars?

This is strange, but I'm sure it'll be remedied. One thing I've noticed is that Rivals really likes the Stanford recruits. Almost without exception, they rated our 2015 recruits higher than Scout, SI, and 247, sometimes significantly higher. But like you mention, the offer list usually tells you all you really need to know.

[Hank 91]

Not that it matters a great deal, but what's up with Williams being a 3 star and being dropped from the #36 to #41 DT on Rivals?  He dominated the Oakland camp, didn't he?  I thought he might get bumped up, but he actually has gone down in ranking there.


I don't think I've ever seen a 3 star recruit with the offer list Michael Williams has.  FWIW, 247 has him as the #23 DT and composite 4 star and Scout ranks him as the #14 DT and a 4 star.  Safe to assume Rivals will be getting its act together on Williams before long and he'll get bumped to 4 stars?

This is strange, but I'm sure it'll be remedied. One thing I've noticed is that Rivals really likes the Stanford recruits. Almost without exception, they rated our 2015 recruits higher than Scout, SI, and 247, sometimes significantly higher. But like you mention, the offer list usually tells you all you really need to know.