[BostonCard]

Here's a version of events from The Stanford Review:

http://stanfordreview.org/article/allega...elections/

Apparently, what was said/asked is under dispute.

If Horowitz assertions are accurate, I agree the preface referring to her Jewish identity was unnecessary.  However, I'm not entirely sure where the outrage is coming from, since it appears Horowitz repeatedly referenced her identity in her application, and the implication in at least some of her statements was that her Jewish identity influenced her ability to advocate for disadvantaged groups.  It was a clumsy question, but I don't think it is necessarily evidence of antisemitism.

BC

[BostonCard]

Here's a version of events from The Stanford Review:

http://stanfordreview.org/article/allega...elections/

Apparently, what was said/asked is under dispute.

If Horowitz assertions are accurate, I agree the preface referring to her Jewish identity was unnecessary.  However, I'm not entirely sure where the outrage is coming from, since it appears Horowitz repeatedly referenced her identity in her application, and the implication in at least some of her statements was that her Jewish identity influenced her ability to advocate for disadvantaged groups.  It was a clumsy question, but I don't think it is necessarily evidence of antisemitism.

BC