[winflop]

[quote author=winflop link=topic=11823.msg114146#msg114146 date=1425511480]

A bad year for Tara is light years ahead of any year under Dawkins

Have you seen Tara's team this year?  With the exception of literally one game, it's been pretty painful to watch...at least as painful as the men.  I believe we had 3 [maybe 4] shot clock violations in one HALF earlier this season.  And, since one Dawkins' team made it to the Sweet Sixteen and another won an NIT title, Tara's team will have to make the National Championship game this year to be considered "light years ahead" of EITHER of those teams.  I hope it happens, but I'm not betting any large amount on it...
[/quote]

Tournament results are not everything, and winning the Not Important Tournament is -- NOT IMPORTANT.

Last year Tara did NOT make the Sweet 16?  2006-2007.  And that team came into the tournament having won 28 of it's last 29 games and having a top seed, not losing 3 of its last four and squeaking in as a #10 seed.

[winflop]

[quote author=winflop link=topic=11823.msg114146#msg114146 date=1425511480]

A bad year for Tara is light years ahead of any year under Dawkins

Have you seen Tara's team this year?  With the exception of literally one game, it's been pretty painful to watch...at least as painful as the men.  I believe we had 3 [maybe 4] shot clock violations in one HALF earlier this season.  And, since one Dawkins' team made it to the Sweet Sixteen and another won an NIT title, Tara's team will have to make the National Championship game this year to be considered "light years ahead" of EITHER of those teams.  I hope it happens, but I'm not betting any large amount on it...
[/quote]

Tournament results are not everything, and winning the Not Important Tournament is -- NOT IMPORTANT.

Last year Tara did NOT make the Sweet 16?  2006-2007.  And that team came into the tournament having won 28 of it's last 29 games and having a top seed, not losing 3 of its last four and squeaking in as a #10 seed.