[Farm93]

Every season seems to fizzle out.  I would think a "good" coach would run through the Pac-12 the first time and then improve the second time through the conference.  I realize the schedule is not balanced like it used to be, but Dawkins has consistently demonstrated that his teams lose ground as the season progresses.  Very frustrating.

I am sure Dawkins is a great guy.  I am sure he can be a winner at some schools.  Yet, seems like after 7 years the sample size is large enough to know that Dawkins style doesn't sell tickets at Stanford, doesn't create excitement on campus, and doesn't produce strong March/April basketball, at least at Stanford.

Sadly I believe Muir will insist on keeping Dawkins.  Perhaps it will be easier to replace Muir first.

[Farm93]

Every season seems to fizzle out.  I would think a "good" coach would run through the Pac-12 the first time and then improve the second time through the conference.  I realize the schedule is not balanced like it used to be, but Dawkins has consistently demonstrated that his teams lose ground as the season progresses.  Very frustrating.

I am sure Dawkins is a great guy.  I am sure he can be a winner at some schools.  Yet, seems like after 7 years the sample size is large enough to know that Dawkins style doesn't sell tickets at Stanford, doesn't create excitement on campus, and doesn't produce strong March/April basketball, at least at Stanford.

Sadly I believe Muir will insist on keeping Dawkins.  Perhaps it will be easier to replace Muir first.