03-04-2015, 05:37 PM
(03-04-2015, 08:35 AM)socalstanfan1 link Wrote:[quote author=CornFed link=topic=9617.msg114088#msg114088 date=1425442429]
I don't think it sounded particularly like he's leaning Stanford's way. Big fan of Brady and commented that Harbaugh will have Michigan on the upswing in 1 or 2 years. Also, he seemed particularly affected by Harbaugh's NFL head coaching experience and mentioned that he had focused on Harbaugh as a coach at the pro level. The only comment he was quoted making about Stanford was to acknowledge our academic excellence.
I felt the same way when I read that article, but I do wonder if the article was written by a reporter who is linked to Michigan, or at least a midwestern regional reporter. If so, those comments might have been simply a response to specific questions. The old, "What stands out for you at Michigan?" "What do you think about Harbaugh and the tradition of quarterbacks at UM?" etc.Â
I suppose we will find out how all this works out soon.
[/quote]
I think you're right SCSF1. A lot of the Michigan feel could very well derive from the writer's presentation. There was quite a bit more discussion of issues related to Michigan, and they were front-loaded in the article relative to the brief acknowledgement that Stanford is also in the picture.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
