There is no D in ASU -
OutsiderFan - 09-25-2014
Even with Taylor Kelly, ASU isn't good enough on defense to contend this year. Winner of U$C and UCLA will win south. And I'm imagining winner of Oregon and Stanford will win North.
I want nothing more this season than a re-match of Stanford and U$C in the Pac-12 CG, as that would mean Stanford would get to beat UCLA and U$C in back to back weeks.
Re: There is no D in ASU -
JohnR34231 - 09-26-2014
Interesting game.
Don't think there are too many games in which a team puts up 38 first downs, 626 yards total offense, and still loses by 35 points.
Re: There is no D in ASU -
Farm93 - 09-26-2014
(09-25-2014, 09:45 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:Even with Taylor Kelly, ASU isn't good enough on defense to contend this year. Winner of U$C and UCLA will win south. And I'm imagining winner of Oregon and Stanford will win North.
I want nothing more this season than a re-match of Stanford and U$C in the Pac-12 CG, as that would mean Stanford would get to beat UCLA and U$C in back to back weeks.
I doubt USC is deep enough to win consistently enough to become the Pac-12 South champs. My guess is that UCLA fans can start planning their trip to Santa Clara now.Â
Re: There is no D in ASU - StanFan88 - 09-26-2014
I think the best team in the South is 3rd or 4th in the North. On par with Oregon St.
Re: There is no D in ASU -
stupac2 - 09-26-2014
I'm really curious about Utah. Their scorelines have looked impressive but I haven't actually been able to watch them. Could this be the year they finally put it together and make a push in the south?
Re: There is no D in ASU -
washingtonismoney - 09-26-2014
(09-26-2014, 09:08 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:I'm really curious about Utah. Their scorelines have looked impressive but I haven't actually been able to watch them. Could this be the year they finally put it together and make a push in the south?
I don't think they have enough quality but if Wilson stays healthy they'll be a tough out for everyone on their schedule.