WBB: Scouting ASU - Printable Version

WBB: Scouting ASU - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: WBB: Scouting ASU (/thread-6630.html)

WBB: Scouting ASU - M T - 01-20-2014

Monday's game may be the toughest game for Stanford until well into the NCAA tournament.Â Â By the NCAA's RPI ranking, ASU (14-2) is ranked #9 (before beating K.al).Â

They beat North Carolina (15-3), Syracuse (12-5), K.al (12-4), USC (12-6).Â The lost to San Diego State (14-2) in the second game of the year, and WSU (11-6), both away games.

Coach Charli Turner Thorne has historically given Stanford a challenge.Â I'd expect she'll have something special against Stanford this year.

In the recent past, she's developed her team so that many players were equivalent.Â It wasn't unusual to see her substitute 5 players at once.Â The one time I've watched them this year, substituting 3 was common.Â Only one player has started all the games (Deja Mann).

K.al's notes about the game says: "The two teams combined for a total of 51 fouls 32 by the Golden Bears in a top 20 matchup played in front of 4,077 fans. All five of Cals starters Gray, Jemerigbe, Boyd, Justine Hartman and Mercedes Jefflo were whistled for at least four fouls."Â ASU slightly out rebounded K.al.Â ASU had five players scoring between 8 and 13 points and seven players with 19 or more minutes.Â

NCAA stat rankings
Interestingly, ASU only shot 1 of 11 threes against K.al, but they're ranked 15th in the NCAA at 38.6%, but they don't shoot many, ranking only 135th.Â They're 26th in FG% offense (45.2%) but only 250th in FG% defense (41.9%).Â They're 41st in scoring offense (77.4).Â 36th in 3PT% defense.Â They are turnover-prone, averaging 19.1 (295th).

Â http://stats.ncaa.org/team/stats?org_id=28&sport_year_ctl_id=11560

#	Player	Yr	Pos	Ht	Min	FGM	FGA	FG%	3FG	3FGA	3FG%	FT	FTA	FT%	PTS	Avg	Off Reb	Def Reb	Tot Reb	Avg	AST	TO	STL	BLK	PF	DQ
5	Mann, Deja	Sr	G	5-7	26	60	158	38	32	82	39	43	51	84	195	11.5	9	49	58	3.4	40	23	21	3	22
14	Thomas, Adrianne	Sr	G	5-9	22	44	93	47	5	11	45	79	106	74	172	10.1	11	36	47	2.8	45	46	23		44	2
24	Moos, Kelsey	Fr	F	6-0	22	55	98	56	3	5	60	31	49	63	144	9.0	38	58	96	6.0	8	27	15	2	30	1
3	Burke, Joy	Sr	F	6-5	17	54	97	56	1	1	100	30	44	68	139	8.2	44	44	88	5.2	8	42	2	10	45	3
10	Amukamara, Promise	Jr	G	5-8	25	53	109	49	3	12	25	28	41	68	137	8.1	18	26	44	2.6	30	26	26	2	48	2
21	Brunner, Sophie	Fr	F	6-1	21	50	91	55		1	0	33	57	57	133	7.8	56	56	112	6.6	16	25	17	6	34
0	Hempen, Katie	So	G	5-9	21	40	118	34	25	71	35	14	23	60	119	7.0	8	19	27	1.6	27	26	17	1	28	1
23	Davis, Elisha	So	G	5-3	19	32	82	39	12	33	36	24	29	82	100	5.9	6	35	41	2.4	57	40	11	2	24
43	Normen, Eliza	So	G	6-0	16	21	53	40		1	0	21	32	65	63	3.9	15	51	66	4.1	25	24	8	8	23
1	Hawkins, Arnecia	So	G	5-10	9	22	64	34	10	27	37	6	8	75	60	3.5	5	12	17	1.0	9	24	10	2	26
22	Dornstauder, Quinn	Fr	C	6-4	6	13	19	68				12	27	44	38	3.2	10	15	25	2.1	2	9	2	9	8
20	Purkovic, Isidora	So	G	5-11	2	2	7	29	1	3	33	1	2	50	6	1.0	2	1	3	0.5		3	2		2
	TEAM																24	41	65	3.9		5
	ASU					446	989	45	92	247	37	322	469	69	1306	76.8	246	443	689	40.5	267	320	154	45	334	9
	Opponent Totals					421	1008	42	52	188	28	211	327	65	1105	65.0	207	378	585	34.4	169	332	143	60	397	16
	Stanford					517	1063	49	128	311	41	207	320	65	1369	80.5	227	503	730	42.9	342	214	120	65	283	3
	Opponent Totals					363	1052	35	101	348	29	194	280	69	1021	60.1	222	379	601	35.4	177	245	94	43	314	10

Comparing Stanford vs ASU team stats:Â Some of ASU's defensive numbers are better.Â They have significantly more FT attempts than Stanford (more drives to the basket?), slightly better offensive rebounds.Â Both they & their opponents have considerably more turnovers and steals.