Would you enjoy a detailed schematic breakdown of Stanford's offense - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Would you enjoy a detailed schematic breakdown of Stanford's offense (/thread-11640.html)

---

Would you enjoy a detailed schematic breakdown of Stanford's offense - washingtonismoney - 02-27-2016

Combined with an assertion that Christian McCaffrey was the best player in the country? Well have I got the analysis for you: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2016/2/26/11119862/unanswerable-questions-part-ii-christian-mccaffrey-stanford-Voldemort

---

Re: Would you enjoy a detailed schematic breakdown of Stanford's offense - BostonCard - 02-27-2016

I like the analysis, but I would like it more if they got their facts right.

Quote:If Stanford were to add an Iso receiver that could command a double team to this equation? Teams would simply be out of answers. As it happens, the Cardinal return all three WRs, McCaffrey, 3/5 of the OL (losing the left side), and will have to fill in new players at QB and TE.

We lose one starting WR, and we only return 2/5 of the OL.  By the way, that receiver we are losing, just posted the fifth best trhee-cone drill time in the last ten years at the combine... at 6'4", 234 lbs.

https://twitter.com/StanfordRivals/status/703736720995389440

BC

---

Re: Would you enjoy a detailed schematic breakdown of Stanford's offense - CowboyIndian - 02-27-2016

(02-27-2016, 06:58 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:We lose one starting WR, and we only return 2/5 of the OL.  By the way, that receiver we are losing, just posted the fifth best trhee-cone drill time in the last ten years at the combine... at 6'4", 234 lbs.

We're doomed!

---