The CardBoard
Shaw is not stubborn - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Shaw is not stubborn (/thread-10087.html)



Shaw is not stubborn - BostonCard - 10-03-2015

https://twitter.com/FO_wordofmuth/status/650537725624369152


Re: Shaw is not stubborn - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015

https://twitter.com/SamHaammer/status/650540560063799296


Re: Shaw is not stubborn - pefloresjr - 10-04-2015

I don't usually care, but at the moment, I really miss the up arrow. 

Cheers,
Pete F.


Re: Shaw is not stubborn - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 10-04-2015

The offense the past few weeks has been unrecognizable from the one that came out against N'western, who is turning out to be a damn good defensive squad.  Last night was spectacular, the offense could pretty much do whatever it wanted.  No Scooby, but Arizona had been advertised as a formidable defense.


Re: Shaw is not stubborn - CTcard - 10-04-2015

(10-04-2015, 03:35 PM)ThePassionOfTheChryst link Wrote:No Scooby, but Arizona had been advertised as a formidable defense.

Anyone who was doing that advertising should go down for fraud.

Arizona currently has the worst statistical offense defense in the Pac 12 - pretty much.
yds/game = 453  12th
yds/play = 5.90  12th
pts/game = 35.2  11th
S&P+ = 36.2  11th

Passion - yeah I meant defense - whoops. Glad you can read what I meant rather than what I wrote.


Re: Shaw is not stubborn - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 10-04-2015

(10-04-2015, 06:19 PM)CTcard link Wrote:[quote author=ThePassionOfTheChryst link=topic=13033.msg132672#msg132672 date=1443998138]
No Scooby, but Arizona had been advertised as a formidable defense.

Anyone who was doing that advertising should go down for fraud.

Arizona currently has the worst statistical offense in the Pac 12 - pretty much.
yds/game = 453  12th
yds/play = 5.90  12th
pts/game = 35.2  11th
S&P+ = 36.2  11th
[/quote]

I said defense, and you appear to have posted defensive stats (based on rankings) but you said offense.  Did you mean defense, or did you think I meant offense?