Re: Class of 2016 -
CrazedZooChimp - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 07:56 PM)ThePassionOfTheChryst link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=9617.msg122003#msg122003 date=1436410301]
Here are athletic testing results from the Opening: http://www.studentsports.com/football/2015/07/08/nike-football-rating-national-championship-results/
Our commits:
Kaden Smith: 4.95 (40); 4.55 (shuttle); 27 inch vert; 82.29 rating -- surprisingly mediocre
Costello -- no results
Curtis Robinson -- 4.72 (40); 4.4 (shuttle); 32.2 inch vert; 103.29
:(
Thankfully there's more to the position than straight-line speed. Anybody have a 10-yard split? Maybe he's a slow starter.
Actually after looking at the list, all the TEs appear to be in the same ballpark.
[/quote]
Other than KJ, Smith might be the recruit we have to worry about the least. He's a consensus 5 star (247 composite) and is the #12 player in the country according to the 247 composite. Unless all four recruiting sites are way off (and all the SEC/Big-12 teams that offered him), he's really really good.
Re: Class of 2016 -
CrazedZooChimp - 07-08-2015
I'm pretty sure we were in Crawford's top 10. Don't necessarily think he's coming, but we're definitely not 100% out of it.
Re: Class of 2016 -
Bruce Wang - 07-09-2015
(07-08-2015, 07:42 AM)Stanford_Cardinals link Wrote:Another top 5 class? Have we ever had a top 5 class?
IIRC Walsh II pulled off a Top 5 class.
Re: Class of 2016 -
dabomb1227 - 07-09-2015
Lamar Winston will be committing today
Re: Class of 2016 -
PrinceLightfoot - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 09:26 AM)dabomb1227 link Wrote:Lamar Winston will be committing today
In interviews, he sounds like a Stanford lean stressing life after football and academics. His twitter seems more pro-Oregon. All 247 analyst have him pointed towards the Ducks which makes sense since he has only visited Oregon and won't be visiting Stanford or UCLA for a few weeks. If he does choose Oregon, we might have a chance to flip him if the visit goes well.
Re: Class of 2016 -
OutsiderFan - 07-09-2015
In all seriousness, can a high academic-minded football player "be all he can be" in the Oregon football culture?Â
I've always believed anyone can succeed in college no matter where they go provided they put as much effort into school as sports. But I really wonder if Oregon is so over the top with the priority it puts on sports, if the culture has a way of pulling kids away from taking school as seriously as they might in other environments.Â
Ergo, if Winston really is serious about school, would he be better off at Stanford just from a cultural and environmental standpoint because he'd be in a culture and around peers that really do prioritize school?
Or is the reality that Stanford players take "soft majors" like ST&S because they too really want to focus on sports, and they choose Stanford knowing that having a Stanford degree gives them a leg up on everyone else after sports are over?
Feel free to move this to another board, as this is another "going off the rails" topic in the class of 2016 thread!
Re: Class of 2016 -
TrumpCard - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 11:53 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:Or is the reality that Stanford players take "soft majors" like ST&S because they too really want to focus on sports, and they choose Stanford knowing that having a Stanford degree gives them a leg up on everyone else after sports are over?
Stanford athletes are heterogeneous, ranging the gamut from Frank Buncom to Casey Jacobson. Obviously, the distribution curve at Stanford leans far more toward the academic side than it does at other schools, especially football factories like Oregon.
Re: Class of 2016 -
washingtonismoney - 07-09-2015
I wouldn't call ST&S a soft major at all. (Or, put another way, if ST&S is the softest Stanford can offer it's in pretty solid shape.)
Re: Class of 2016 -
BostonCard - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 12:05 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:I wouldn't call ST&S a soft major at all. (Or, put another way, if ST&S is the softest Stanford can offer it's in pretty solid shape.)
What he said. I seriously contemplating majoring in STS (but eventually settled on Chemistry). Athletes like STS as a major because it is very
flexible. There is only one absolutely required class (STS 1). The rest of the requirements are more a la carte from a menu.
https://sts.stanford.edu/major-sts/core-requirements
That doesn't mean that STS is not
rigorous. You can look at the courses in the requirements.
BC
Re: Class of 2016 -
TrumpCard - 07-09-2015
Robbie Robinson (complete with tea leaves):
http://www.scout.com/college/football/recruiting/story/1562134-east-s-no-7-cb-robinson-nearing-decision
Re: Class of 2016 -
PalmTree - 07-09-2015
Winston committed to the Ducks.. ::)
Re: Class of 2016 -
socalstanfan1 - 07-09-2015
Must say, disappointing. But a reminder to take student comments about "the 40 year decision" and high stress on academic with a grain (or maybe a heaping portion) of salt.
On the other hand, maybe he is committing to Oregon to hold a place and then goes ahead with the Stanford application process.Â
Re: Class of 2016 -
washingtonismoney - 07-09-2015
He's going to take a visit to Stanford and UCLA. Made-for-TV commitment.
Re: Class of 2016 -
JohnR34231 - 07-10-2015
(07-09-2015, 06:38 PM)socalstanfan1 link Wrote:Must say, disappointing. But a reminder to take student comments about "the 40 year decision" and high stress on academic with a grain (or maybe a heaping portion) of salt.
On the other hand, maybe he is committing to Oregon to hold a place and then goes ahead with the Stanford application process.
Yeah, I've never been a fan of recruits committing and continuing to take visits, but perhaps the schools contribute to that by telling them if they don't pull the trigger now there won't be a place for them.
Re: Class of 2016 -
TrumpCard - 07-10-2015
Costello ranked #3 so far at the Elite 11.
Before you get upset that Shaw passed on the Stanford legacy ranked #1, note that he measured 6'1", 185. Not a pro-style QB.
[tweet]619536708598501376[/tweet]
Re: Class of 2016 -
Leftcoast - 07-10-2015
I'm happy with Costello and in Shaw I trust but I wouldn't write off Buechele.Â
Although he looks a little reedy now college strength and conditioning will add needed bulk and if Buechele puts 25-30 lbs on that frame there are plenty of comparables in the NFL at his height. For example, Drew Brees at 6.0 and 209 lbs or Aaron Rogers at 6.2 and 225 have done pretty well in pro-style sets.
Also, things turned out pretty well for the small, reedy guy on the left in this picture.Â
(Peyton Manning with his brother Cooper in a high school football picture. Peyton now wears #18 in honor of his brother who had to give up football due to a medical condition.)
Re: Class of 2016 -
washingtonismoney - 07-10-2015
More to the point I doubt there's a brobdingnagian difference between finishing #1 and #3 in an event like this.
Re: Class of 2016 -
stupac2 - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 11:01 AM)leftcoast link Wrote:Also, things turned out pretty well for the small, reedy guy on the left in this picture.Â
![[Image: manning-to-manning.jpg]](https://tchez814.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/manning-to-manning.jpg)
(Peyton Manning with his brother Cooper in a high school football picture. Peyton now wears #18 in honor of his brother who had to give up football due to a medical condition.)
Wow, I was wondering why Eli was taller than Peyton. That's some family resemblance between Eli and Cooper.
Re: Class of 2016 -
TrumpCard - 07-10-2015
I over-stated the case against Beuchele. He might end up being a very good QB. I just discount the ratings of small high school QBs based on 7-on-7 competition because the format masks the disadvantage of being small. Other big QBs who are extremely highly ranked (Eason, Franks) did not do as well in the rankings at The Opening. The fact that Costello did so well even though he didn't get to take full advantage of his size is a great sign.Â
Re: Class of 2016 -
oman - 07-10-2015
Hey, I just want Texas to end up with any one of these guys. Bad times on the Forty Acres.
Short Texas quarterbacks sometimes do okay for themselves....