Class of 2016 - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Class of 2016 (/thread-6799.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Class of 2016 (/thread-6799.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
Re: Class of 2016 - yvonne - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 04:27 AM)JPRI link Wrote:[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=9617.msg121910#msg121910 date=1436333435]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=9617.msg121901#msg121901 date=1436316782]
Demetris Robertson names Stanford and bama his top two: http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/pac12/insider/post?id=88051
Quote:"Me and K.J. have been talking for the last two months or so, he's been on me hard," Robertson said. "I just like the atmosphere out there at Stanford. I know football isn't going to last that long, so I know I need a strong academic foundation."
What's Robertson's first language?
Somehow I've got this feeling that if all Stanford recruits were required to live up to the grammar standards promulgated by the CardBoard Grammar Police we wouldn't have much of a class.
[/quote][/quote]
Grammar police? He doesn't know a subject from an object! That's pretty basic. Me has been talking?
You guys are always bragging about how intelligent Stanford athletes are and yet they can't form a basic sentence at a five-year-old's level? You find that acceptable?
Re: Class of 2016 - 2 for 2028 - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 08:19 AM)PrinceLightfoot link Wrote:I think the highest recruiting ranking we have received was #5 from Rivals in 2012.
Costello is putting on a hell of a show at the Elite11 competition, but unfortunately the event is closed off to many recruiting sites. My guess is that he will earn a fifth star after his senior season if he continues to perform at a high level. Several other less evaluated players will hopefully receive a bump as well.
Finishing with a consensus top15 recruiting class seems almost a certainty. If we land both Kelly and Robertson along with Costello receiving a fifth star, that may push us to top5 territory. While the cumulative quality of recruits can be very good, putting together players with the right fit and skill set for an offense or defense is probably more important.
The results of recruiting rankings along with actual results is surprising. This article contains that comparison:
http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/02/ranking_the_rankers_revisiting.html
Nine out of twenty five teams that had an average top25 recruiting class between 2010-2013 did not finish the 2013 season ranked in the top25. That seems like a high percentage of misses considering the amount of stacked talented. It is most likely explained by some coaching, injury, or position group deficiency factor.
Recall that our class of 2008 was not ranked in the top 25 but was retrospectively considered the third best class:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/33391/re-ranking-the-2008-recruiting-classes
Re: Class of 2016 - Durty Nelly - 07-08-2015
Strong position with David Long. We are recruiting him as a DB now. Akina looks to be making us DBU (Defensive Back University).
http://www.scout.com/college/football/recruiting/story/1561666-the-opening-david-long
Re: Class of 2016 - stupac2 - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 08:26 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:Grammar police? He doesn't know a subject from an object! That's pretty basic. Me has been talking?
You guys are always bragging about how intelligent Stanford athletes are and yet they can't form a basic sentence at a five-year-old's level? You find that acceptable?
I don't think that judging someone on their language use in incredibly informal situations (and for teenagers twitter is informal) makes any sense. People are incredibly flexible in the way they use language and tune it for their audience, if you're around friends who don't use language well you probably won't either. Plus with tweets you can't rule out Cupertinos or other random errors.
Re: Class of 2016 - washingtonismoney - 07-08-2015
NEXT ON CARDBOARD: How can Janis Joplin be a famous musical artist when she CANNOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN A SUBJECT OR OBJECT in "Me and Bobby McGee"?
And don't get us started on Paul Simon's "Me And Julio Down At The Schoolyard." He MAY BE "Rhymin' Paul Simon" but he's certainly no "Grammatically Sound Simon", THAT'S FOR DARN SURE.
Re: Class of 2016 - yvonne - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 08:56 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=9617.msg121931#msg121931 date=1436369213]Grammar police? He doesn't know a subject from an object! That's pretty basic. Me has been talking?
You guys are always bragging about how intelligent Stanford athletes are and yet they can't form a basic sentence at a five-year-old's level? You find that acceptable?
I don't think that judging someone on their language use in incredibly informal situations (and for teenagers twitter is informal) makes any sense. People are incredibly flexible in the way they use language and tune it for their audience, if you're around friends who don't use language well you probably won't either. Plus with tweets you can't rule out Cupertinos or other random errors.
[/quote]
What you really mean is "I don't value my own language enough to be able to speak it correctly." Have you ever wondered why the epithet "police" is never leveled at any other discipline? No one ever complains "oh, those damn math police keep insisting that one and one is two." You even celebrate people who know pi to a certain number of digits, yet you deride those who think Wnglish should be spoken at a level higher than a cave man's speech.
Re: Class of 2016 - PrinceLightfoot - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 08:26 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:You guys are always bragging about how intelligent Stanford athletes are and yet they can't form a basic sentence at a five-year-old's level? You find that acceptable?
Intelligence is not always captured by one's ability to speak using correct grammar; grammar is a set a rules and knowing rules is not a reflection of intelligence.
There is a difference between a high school student's speech and that same student's speech after a few years at Stanford. Environment and exposure are directly attributable to how one speaks. I never thought I would be utilizing something learned from my anthropology CIV classes in any form, but there you have it.
Re: Class of 2016 - OutsiderFan - 07-08-2015
Request for new thread on grammar policing!
Re: Class of 2016 - Spiny_Norman - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 09:15 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:NEXT ON CARDBOARD: How can Janis Joplin be a famous musical artist when she CANNOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN A SUBJECT OR OBJECT in "Me and Bobby McGee"?
Ha! That song was written by Kris Kristoffersen, a Rhodes Scholar at Pomona. I don't think we can equate a Rhodes Scholar and Hall of Fame songwriter with a high school recruit. But Kristoffersen's college football career was undistinguished. Robinson - we'll see.
Re: Class of 2016 - washingtonismoney - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 10:06 AM)Spiny_Norman link Wrote:Ha! That song was written by Kris Kristoffersen, a Rhodes Scholar at Pomona. I don't think we can equate a Rhodes Scholar and Hall of Fame songwriter with a high school recruit. But Kristoffersen's college football career was undistinguished. Robinson - we'll see.
Well, I think that proves my point: if a Rhodes Scholar/all-time-great songwriter uses and abuses grammatical uses for his own convenience, why should the rest of us bother?
We speak, and write, differently according to circumstance. For instance my previous ALL CAPS LOCK writing is commonly accepted on the internet for emphasis or sarcasm; but you'd never get away with it at the New York Times. I will swear for a joke in front of my friends; but I won't even bother with the joke -- let alone the swearing -- with my grandmother. Anyone who's being honest with themselves knows they behave the same way.
Furthermore, we know what the purpose of grammar is: it's to provide an agreed-upon framework to organize language and make it mutually comprehensible. Everyone knew exactly what was meant by "Me and K.J."; who cares if he expressed it "K.J. and I"? So I'm a bit bemused that anyone has the energy to care about this.
ADDITION: I also find it hard to believe that anyone thinks Robertson doesn't know the grammatical rule in question. Anyone prone to using "atmosphere" and "academic foundation" in a sentence probably has a sufficient grammatical grasp to get this.
Re: Class of 2016 - CompSci87 - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 09:15 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:NEXT ON CARDBOARD: How can Janis Joplin be a famous musical artist when she CANNOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN A SUBJECT OR OBJECT in "Me and Bobby McGee"?
The lyric is "Feeling good was good enough for me, good enough for me and Bobby McGee." "Me" looks like the object of a preposition to me, professor.
Re: Class of 2016 - washingtonismoney - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 10:20 AM)CompSci87 link Wrote:The lyric is "Feeling good was good enough for me, good enough for me and Bobby McGee." "Me" looks like the object of a preposition to me, professor.
A reasonable reading should differentiate between the use of the the phrase in the lyric and the use of the phrase in the title.
Re: Class of 2016 - stupac2 - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 09:54 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:What you really mean is "I don't value my own language enough to be able to speak it correctly." Have you ever wondered why the epithet "police" is never leveled at any other discipline? No one ever complains "oh, those damn math police keep insisting that one and one is two." You even celebrate people who know pi to a certain number of digits, yet you deride those who think Wnglish should be spoken at a level higher than a cave man's speech.
That's because the language police are almost always either:
1) Themselves ignorant/incorrect. Or
2) Making much ado about nothing.
Like here, for instance, why on god's green earth do you care about what a recruit says in a tweet? The fact that you're judging him on it says more about you than the tweet does about him.
Re: Class of 2016 - Nan3cy - 07-08-2015
The whole "me" vs "I" thing is getting more and more muddled over time, it seems to me. For example, does anyone say "It's I" any more, when self-identifying? I consider myself at least an unpaid auxiliary member of the grammar police, but I think everyone I know would say "it's me" -- and I don't complain. That's what I say too. That's how language changes, isn't it? -- improper usage becomes so widely used that eventually it's just the way it is. And eventually the new improper usage becomes the thing that the defenders of the language demand (maybe after a few generations, of course).
Now, the use of "which" when I think it should be "that" -- that gets to me. I'm reading David Halberstam's The Children, and he constantly uses "which" when I think he should be using "that." I think he was a terrific writer, but I think he messed up on that one.
Re: Class of 2016 - CrazedZooChimp - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 09:54 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:What you really mean is "I don't value my own language enough to be able to speak it correctly." Have you ever wondered why the epithet "police" is never leveled at any other discipline? No one ever complains "oh, those damn math police keep insisting that one and one is two." You even celebrate people who know pi to a certain number of digits, yet you deride those who think Wnglish should be spoken at a level higher than a cave man's speech.
Oh, if someone were to consistently correct my rounding of Pi by saying "it's 3.14159... not 3.14, how did you ever graduate college" I would be just as likely to call them an ass as I am someone who yells at me for ending a sentence with a preposition. It's just most engineers and scientists don't give a shit enough to bother doing that on the internet...
Seriously though, can we keep the stuff that isn't directly about the class of 2016 out of the thread. In order to help with that, looks like Fehoko is going to announce soon, seems very likely to be us:
[tweet]618636443133415424[/tweet]
And it looks like 4 star DB Treyjohn Butler is going to be committing relatively soon (mid-August) as well. I imagine we're in a good spot for him too:
[tweet]618262831587196928[/tweet]
Re: Class of 2016 - TrumpCard - 07-08-2015
Now they are just teasing us:
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/ncfrecruiting/on-the-trail/insider/post?id=69869
He'll never come to Stanford, but I suppose it's nice that Stanford has generated enough positive buzz to be part of the conversation.
Re: Class of 2016 - ChicagoCard - 07-08-2015
Quote:Plus with tweets you can't rule out Cupertinos or other random errors.
Did anybody catch this from earlier in this thread? Was this a result of the auto-correction program?
Re: Class of 2016 - StanfordMatt - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 05:58 AM)PrinceLightfoot link Wrote:Let's not be so quick to judge our prospects in this way. It has an air of superiority with the sense of looking down one's nose. Robertson reports a 3.8 GPA, thus he is on the Stanford recruiting radar.
Let's remove the qualifiers and call a spade a spade. The criticisms of Robertson's comments are snobbish and unwarranted especially given the informal nature of Robertson's interview.
Re: Class of 2016 - yvonne - 07-08-2015
If the ability to speak one's native language above the level of "me is going to the store" is snobbish, then count me in. The reality is that most of the posters on this board don't value being able to speak and write correctly. No one here would consider it snobbish if a recruit were to say that he, Bob, and Joe had committed, so we had a total of two commitments. You don't give a damn whether these guys can read and write, as long as they can catch a ball.
Re: Class of 2016 - Langdude - 07-08-2015
(07-08-2015, 11:31 AM)ChicagoVisitor link Wrote:Quote:Plus with tweets you can't rule out Cupertinos or other random errors.
Did anybody catch this from earlier in this thread? Was this a result of the auto-correction program?
Yes. No and yes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupertino_effect
-m.