The CardBoard
Looks like Mason's gone - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Looks like Mason's gone (/thread-6615.html)

Pages: 1 2 3

In presser: Mason said staff would be set... - Redrum - 01-18-2014

within 48 hrs.  Said guys are identified.

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - washingtonismoney - 01-19-2014

So coaching search said Shaw and Mason talked about Bloomgren. I wonder whether they negotiated over how many and which coaches Mason would be allowed to poach?

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - yvonne - 01-19-2014

I think the Bloomgren tweet may have been a snipe about the Stanford offense. I can't always tell with tweets.

One of the committed and admitted recruits may recommit because of the loss of Kotulski.

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - washingtonismoney - 01-19-2014

(01-19-2014, 09:55 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:I think the Bloomgren tweet may have been a snipe about the Stanford offense. I can't always tell with tweets.

I don't see a snipe here. FootballScoop plays it straight: https://twitter.com/footballscoop/status/424268628892991488

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - 71Bear - 01-19-2014

Pub...

Best hire of this off season by far...

James Franklin at Penn State.  He is a winner who performed a miracle at Vandy.  Mason will be hard-pressed to keep it going.  I look forward to seeing Franklin work his magic at his next restoration project.

Mason could prove to be a winning choice but without HC experience, one can only guess if he has what it takes to lead a program.  Add in the fact that he is coaching in the best conference in the country...  Wow.  Good luck to him.....


Re: Looks like Mason's gone - stan01 - 01-19-2014

(01-19-2014, 09:55 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:One of the committed and admitted recruits may recommit because of the loss of Kotulski.

Now I'm curious.

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - Extra Point - 01-19-2014

(01-19-2014, 09:55 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:One of the committed and admitted recruits may recommit because of the loss of Kotulski.

Are you speculating or do you have some inside information about this?

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - yvonne - 01-20-2014

One of the services quoted Okereke as saying that if Kotulski left, he might reconsider his commitment. I was waiting to hear from the writer who said it, but I think this tweet speaks volumes:

https://twitter.com/BobbyOkereke/status/425483301017501696/photo/1

@CoachDavidShaw in the house 🏈🌲 pic.twitter.com/Xw59kUSBP1

[Image: Beeezs_CMAE00Sg.jpg]

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - needle - 01-21-2014

If anybody was serious about Diaz, he's been named DC at La.Tech, according to Feldman.

https://twitter.com/BFeldmanCBS


Re: Looks like Mason's gone - ChicagoCard - 01-24-2014

In a tennessean.com article Mason commented on the evolution of the defense from 2010, which I thought was interesting (while I wait eagerly to find out who replaces Mason, Kotulski and Sanford)...

Quote:“We had a great staff at Stanford and we took the first two years of our defense being in place (2010-2011) and looked at why we weren’t successful,” Mason said. “If you look at what my strengths have been, it had a lot to do with being able to make adjustments and changes to what you do. We had to look at what we were doing structurally and we modified it. We made it easier for our guys to get lined up, play fast and make calls and adjustments.

“I think it has to do with the deception of (Oregon) trying to create numbers, trying to create mismatch problems. What we did was make it simple for our guys. When you allow smart players to get lined up to play football versus trying to out-scheme your opponent, you allow the guys to play with confidence. And when they play with confidence, they can play fast and physical.”

I remember comments from Tarver that preached the same philosophy. Any chance they lure him back from the Raiders?

Further, I didn't know much about Vavae Tata but apparently he'll coach Vandy's defensive line... meaning might have been a candidate to take over after Randy Hart.

Re: Looks like Mason's gone - 71Bear - 01-24-2014

Thanks for linking the article Chicago... 

I have been intrigued with trying to understand why Stanford is so successful v. teams that play the spread O but struggle against more physical, power-oriented O's.  I think the article gave us some clues why this is happening.  It will be interesting to see how the new DC addresses this issue in the future. 



Re: Looks like Mason's gone - rudruff - 01-24-2014

I think struggle is kind of an overstatement. USC and MSU had less than 100 rushing yds combined against Stanford. Throw in the OSU total and the 3 "power" teams get just north of 100 yards rushing. Utah ran well (176yds) but got to play against a 3rd string NT.

The three losses aren't even truly similar. Utah and USC got a lead by changing their tendencies early and hung on as Stanford came back. MSU is really the only team that has been able to come back on Stanford and win.

Offensive play calling has been frustrating as watching it live you hope they do certain things more, but the box score often refutes that. It may be that our comfort level with close games just removed our willingness to try certain things (outside runs, short patterns).

Given the changes that have happened since the end of the season, my hope is that the defense won't be called on to hold everyone under 20 points for a win.







Re: Looks like Mason's gone - washingtonismoney - 01-24-2014

(01-24-2014, 10:26 AM)rudruff link Wrote:The three losses aren't even truly similar. Utah and University of Spoiled Children  got a lead by changing their tendencies early and hung on as Stanford came back. MSU is really the only team that has been able to come back on Stanford and win.

Utah didn't change anything about its tendencies offensively. We were flat unprepared for the swing pass. That and the Fiesta Bowl were Mason's big blemishes.