Positives - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Positives (/thread-2724.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Positives (/thread-2724.html)
Don't mean to run this into the ground, but... - JohnR34231 - 01-03-2012
.......if we don't think having a football team (and an athletic program) is a pretty worthy endeavor, then why are we wasting our time in this board?
Don't mean to run this into the ground, but... - JohnR34231 - 01-03-2012
.......if we don't think having a football team (and an athletic program) is a pretty worthy endeavor, then why are we wasting our time in this board?
Don't mean to run this into the ground, but... - JohnR34231 - 01-03-2012
.......if we don't think having a football team (and an athletic program) is a pretty worthy endeavor, then why are we wasting our time in this board?
Don't mean to run this into the ground, but... - JohnR34231 - 01-03-2012
.......if we don't think having a football team (and an athletic program) is a pretty worthy endeavor, then why are we wasting our time in this board?
Re: Positives - jacketree - 01-03-2012
Well, maybe we could just call Stanford the University of John Arrillaga.....Doesn't Stanford have the largest athletic endowment of any program? Or at least the nicest bathrooms? Harping on the U of O for Phil Knight seems a little silly and hypocritical. We have plenty of athletic sugar daddies.
Back on point to positives:
Stanford looked great against a great opponent, obviating concerns that this season's success was smoke and weak Pac12 mirrors. Wish he made the kick, but he didn't. But a duck hook doesn't really change how good that game was, or how well Stanford played.
I hope we have the chance to win or even lose BCS games again in the near future. It has been an incredible two-year run.
Re: Positives - jacketree - 01-03-2012
Well, maybe we could just call Stanford the University of John Arrillaga.....Doesn't Stanford have the largest athletic endowment of any program? Or at least the nicest bathrooms? Harping on the U of O for Phil Knight seems a little silly and hypocritical. We have plenty of athletic sugar daddies.
Back on point to positives:
Stanford looked great against a great opponent, obviating concerns that this season's success was smoke and weak Pac12 mirrors. Wish he made the kick, but he didn't. But a duck hook doesn't really change how good that game was, or how well Stanford played.
I hope we have the chance to win or even lose BCS games again in the near future. It has been an incredible two-year run.
Re: Positives - jacketree - 01-03-2012
Well, maybe we could just call Stanford the University of John Arrillaga.....Doesn't Stanford have the largest athletic endowment of any program? Or at least the nicest bathrooms? Harping on the U of O for Phil Knight seems a little silly and hypocritical. We have plenty of athletic sugar daddies.
Back on point to positives:
Stanford looked great against a great opponent, obviating concerns that this season's success was smoke and weak Pac12 mirrors. Wish he made the kick, but he didn't. But a duck hook doesn't really change how good that game was, or how well Stanford played.
I hope we have the chance to win or even lose BCS games again in the near future. It has been an incredible two-year run.
Re: Positives - jacketree - 01-03-2012
Well, maybe we could just call Stanford the University of John Arrillaga.....Doesn't Stanford have the largest athletic endowment of any program? Or at least the nicest bathrooms? Harping on the U of O for Phil Knight seems a little silly and hypocritical. We have plenty of athletic sugar daddies.
Back on point to positives:
Stanford looked great against a great opponent, obviating concerns that this season's success was smoke and weak Pac12 mirrors. Wish he made the kick, but he didn't. But a duck hook doesn't really change how good that game was, or how well Stanford played.
I hope we have the chance to win or even lose BCS games again in the near future. It has been an incredible two-year run.
Re: Positives - washingtonismoney - 01-04-2012
One more positive: thought Schwartzstein did a fabulous job getting the protections right. Seemed like almost every OK State blitz was snuffed out with impunity.
Re: Positives - washingtonismoney - 01-04-2012
One more positive: thought Schwartzstein did a fabulous job getting the protections right. Seemed like almost every OK State blitz was snuffed out with impunity.
Re: Positives - washingtonismoney - 01-04-2012
One more positive: thought Schwartzstein did a fabulous job getting the protections right. Seemed like almost every OK State blitz was snuffed out with impunity.
Re: Positives - washingtonismoney - 01-04-2012
One more positive: thought Schwartzstein did a fabulous job getting the protections right. Seemed like almost every OK State blitz was snuffed out with impunity.
Re: Positives - StannyBoy - 01-04-2012
another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Re: Positives - StannyBoy - 01-04-2012
another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Re: Positives - StannyBoy - 01-04-2012
another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Re: Positives - StannyBoy - 01-04-2012
another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Re: Positives - socalstanfan1 - 01-04-2012
(01-04-2012, 10:19 AM)young_money link Wrote:another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Great News! At this point, I'll be surprised if Sanders does not choose Stanford. We'll find out soon enough
Re: Positives - socalstanfan1 - 01-04-2012
(01-04-2012, 10:19 AM)young_money link Wrote:another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Great News! At this point, I'll be surprised if Sanders does not choose Stanford. We'll find out soon enough
Re: Positives - socalstanfan1 - 01-04-2012
(01-04-2012, 10:19 AM)young_money link Wrote:another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Great News! At this point, I'll be surprised if Sanders does not choose Stanford. We'll find out soon enough
Re: Positives - socalstanfan1 - 01-04-2012
(01-04-2012, 10:19 AM)young_money link Wrote:another positive is Barry J. Sanders was admitted. ;D
Great News! At this point, I'll be surprised if Sanders does not choose Stanford. We'll find out soon enough