The CardBoard
Stanford - UW game thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford - UW game thread (/thread-14841.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - Trevmiesterj - 11-10-2017

Huskies d-line is very stout and even though Cardinal O-Line playing well, they won't win more than half the time.

Spieghts just doesn't have the vision and speed to tip the balance.

So agreed.  KJ must go off.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - Trevmiesterj - 11-10-2017

Huskies d-line is very stout and even though Cardinal O-Line playing well, they won't win more than half the time.

Spieghts just doesn't have the vision and speed to tip the balance.

So agreed.  KJ must go off.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017

Agree. They are going to have to keep throwing it downfield. Would sure like to see the TEs involved.

(11-10-2017, 10:21 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=RedShift link=topic=17955.msg211653#msg211653 date=1510377559]
If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.

I'm not at all confident that'll happen.

Costello needs to win this game, if it can be won at all.
[/quote]

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017

Agree. They are going to have to keep throwing it downfield. Would sure like to see the TEs involved.

(11-10-2017, 10:21 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=RedShift link=topic=17955.msg211653#msg211653 date=1510377559]
If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.

I'm not at all confident that'll happen.

Costello needs to win this game, if it can be won at all.
[/quote]

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

I will say, the pass protection has been outstanding.

Bc

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

I will say, the pass protection has been outstanding.

Bc

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - CornFed - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:17 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=lex24 link=topic=17955.msg211646#msg211646 date=1510377219]
Fade?  BC - .........

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade.  The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasn’t intercepted.

BC
[/quote]

The jumpball.  Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
[/quote]

That pattern worked fine.  JJ just needed to stick his butt out further to get a tad more separation.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - CornFed - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:17 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=lex24 link=topic=17955.msg211646#msg211646 date=1510377219]
Fade?  BC - .........

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade.  The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasn’t intercepted.

BC
[/quote]

The jumpball.  Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
[/quote]

That pattern worked fine.  JJ just needed to stick his butt out further to get a tad more separation.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - martyup - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:22 PM)lex24 link Wrote:It’s a bummer that Bryce got hurt several weeks ago. I don’t think you see him in second half. Or next eeek.

[Image: 279460smpy6j2dkh.gif]

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - martyup - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:22 PM)lex24 link Wrote:It’s a bummer that Bryce got hurt several weeks ago. I don’t think you see him in second half. Or next eeek.

[Image: 279460smpy6j2dkh.gif]

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

The UW band is not bad. #stateyourunpopularopinion

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

The UW band is not bad. #stateyourunpopularopinion

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - RedShift - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:21 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=RedShift link=topic=17955.msg211653#msg211653 date=1510377559]
If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.

I'm not at all confident that'll happen.

Costello needs to win this game, if it can be won at all.
[/quote]

You are probably right.
Peterson will make some adjustments against the passing game. He may try to confuse Costello with delayed blitzes, etc. on obvious passing situations. They seem to be defending the KJ roll outs OK. I hope Shaw starts with some short passes.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - Trevmiesterj - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:26 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:I will say, the pass protection has been outstanding.

Bc

+1.  Would like to see KJ running north south and not east west so much.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - RedShift - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:21 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=RedShift link=topic=17955.msg211653#msg211653 date=1510377559]
If Stanford can run the ball in the second half with Speights, we have a good chance.

I'm not at all confident that'll happen.

Costello needs to win this game, if it can be won at all.
[/quote]

You are probably right.
Peterson will make some adjustments against the passing game. He may try to confuse Costello with delayed blitzes, etc. on obvious passing situations. They seem to be defending the KJ roll outs OK. I hope Shaw starts with some short passes.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - Trevmiesterj - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:26 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:I will say, the pass protection has been outstanding.

Bc

+1.  Would like to see KJ running north south and not east west so much.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017

There was a run on two where a healthy Love possibly pops it. Particularly his last run.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - lex24 - 11-10-2017

There was a run on two where a healthy Love possibly pops it. Particularly his last run.

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:27 PM)CornFed link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211651#msg211651 date=1510377459]
[quote author=lex24 link=topic=17955.msg211646#msg211646 date=1510377219]
Fade?  BC - .........

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade.  The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasn’t intercepted.

BC
[/quote]

The jumpball.  Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
[/quote]

That pattern worked fine.  JJ just needed to stick his butt out further to get a tad more separation.
[/quote]

Safety came over the top to help defend.

BC

Re: Stanford - UW game thread - BostonCard - 11-10-2017

(11-10-2017, 10:27 PM)CornFed link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211651#msg211651 date=1510377459]
[quote author=lex24 link=topic=17955.msg211646#msg211646 date=1510377219]
Fade?  BC - .........

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17955.msg211629#msg211629 date=1510376674]
UW knows how to defend the fade.  The safety covered a lot of ground, and we are lucky it wasn’t intercepted.

BC
[/quote]

The jumpball.  Ironically, the outside corner fade would have worked there, though hard to execute from that far out.
[/quote]

That pattern worked fine.  JJ just needed to stick his butt out further to get a tad more separation.
[/quote]

Safety came over the top to help defend.

BC