The CardBoard
Outside Topic 2022 Giants thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Outside Topic 2022 Giants thread (/thread-23115.html)



RE: 2022 Giants thread - lex24 - 05-22-2022

Current ownership is responsible for the only World Series championships in the SF-era of the franchise. How can one be unhappy about that? 

Overall, I have no problem with how the Giants function.
[/quote]

Yes and no.  I believe the controlling interest has changed since 2014.  And I know that Greg Johnson is now the lead dog.  My concern is that he has a different “philosophy”.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Giants - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 09:32 AM)lex24 Wrote:  Current ownership is responsible for the only World Series championships in the SF-era of the franchise. How can one be unhappy about that? 

Overall, I have no problem with how the Giants function.

Yes and no.  I believe the controlling interest has changed since 2014.  And I know that Greg Johnson is now the lead dog.  My concern is that he has a different “philosophy”.
[/quote]

The “control person” has changed over the years (Magowan, Neukom, Baer, Johnson the Younger) but the investor group that owns the team hasn’t changed significantly since the sale of the shares once owned by the heirs of Sue Burns (the largest share holder until her death in 2009). That sale occurred in 2011 when Charles Johnson became the club’s largest shareholder.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - lex24 - 05-22-2022

The “control person” has changed over the years (Magowan, Neukom, Baer, Johnson the Younger) but the investor group that owns the team hasn’t changed significantly since the sale of the shares once owned by the heirs of Sue Burns (the largest share holder until her death in 2009).  That sale occurred in 2011 when Charles Johnson became the club’s largest shareholder.
[/quote]

Yep.  I believe Johnson bought Burns share.  But however it’s sliced, it appears to me the group has become more, to be kind, “thrifty.”  I’ll stop now on this  (at least till the deadline nears) as I think I’ve  beaten this dead horse….


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Phogge - 05-22-2022

Ike fought it with what he had and your thesis, if correct, doesn't matter. He won.

At various times he had Churchill, DeGaulle, Monty, Patton, Uncle Joe salivating for a second front as adversaries. Marshall knew what he was getting when he picked Ike and FDR knew what he was doing when Marshall wanted to lead the invasion.

I bet there are a number of people in the front office who would give Soto the money. Hope they don't.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - OutsiderFan - 05-22-2022

If you aren't spending up to the luxury tax, you aren't trying hard enough on the free agent side of the equation. The only exception is if you have a young core you need to pay for as they grow out of their team control years.

The Giants have no such players on their roster.  Even if Luciano started in 2023, the Giants would have him under control for 6 years. There is no denying the Giants aren't spending enough to win. It might not be that bad if they were in say the NL Central. But they aren't. They are in the NL West, playing 38 games against the Dodgers and Padres, who are both over the luxury tax, and both ahead of them in the standings.

The Dodgers and Padres are spending a combined $200M more than the Giants on payroll in 2022. It's unforgivable for the Giants to be so behind.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - lex24 - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 10:48 AM)Phogge Wrote:  Ike fought it with what he had and your thesis, if correct, doesn't matter. He won.

At various times he had Churchill, DeGaulle, Monty, Patton, Uncle Joe salivating for a second front as adversaries. Marshall knew what he was getting when he picked Ike and FDR knew what he was doing when Marshall wanted to lead the invasion.

I bet there are a number of people in the front office who would give Soto the money. Hope they don't.

Whose going to help us on the Eastern front….. :).


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Giants - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 10:43 AM)lex24 Wrote:  The “control person” has changed over the years (Magowan, Neukom, Baer, Johnson the Younger) but the investor group that owns the team hasn’t changed significantly since the sale of the shares once owned by the heirs of Sue Burns (the largest share holder until her death in 2009).  That sale occurred in 2011 when Charles Johnson became the club’s largest shareholder.

Yep.  I believe Johnson bought Burns share.  But however it’s sliced, it appears to me the group has become more, to be kind, “thrifty.”  I’ll stop now on this  (at least till the deadline nears) as I think I’ve  beaten this dead horse….
[/quote]

You say “thrifty”, I say “sensible”.

Yeah, we have beaten this one to death.  No big deal.  Time to move on to a topic I think we agree upon.

At the 2022 quarter pole, I think it is safe to say that Keith Law of the The Athletic was correct when, prior to the 2018 MLB draft, he wrote that Bart would struggle making contact at the big league level.  

You can’t miss when you have the #2 selection in the draft and I am beginning to believe SF blew that choice.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Phogge - 05-22-2022

Lex, DC and OF need to buy the team. Perhaps the bitching will stop.

Lex majority owner, the others.... silent.


lex24 - lex24 - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 01:08 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Lex, DC and OF need to buy the team. Perhaps the bitching will stop.

Lex majority owner, the others.... silent.

Wish I had the necessary Billions; then I’d take you up on it. :)

If you can’t bitch as a fan, what’s the fun!  On pace  to win  88.  Not a bad first 40. Especially with the injuries.


Pads are going to be very tough. They are good now.  And they are going to add Tatis.  Clevinger working way back.  Snell a wild card.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Phogge - 05-22-2022

Not giving up but fire sale possibilities down the line.

Nobody is safe except for Webb, possibly Doval. Need prospects who are ready in '23.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - DC 86 - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 05:12 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Not giving up but fire sale possibilities down the line.

Nobody is safe except for Webb, possibly Doval. Need prospects who are ready in '23.

The Giants don't have anyone (besides Webb) who would provide any meaningful return at the deadline.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Phogge - 05-22-2022

Beg to differ. Belt, Yaz, Crawford will get hot at some point. We are already seeing tons of players going down. Giants may not be able to bring AAA talent but Farhan has a sharp eye.

Now as usual you respond, Go for it pal.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - lex24 - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 05:43 PM)DC 86 Wrote:  
(05-22-2022, 05:12 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Not giving up but fire sale possibilities down the line.

Nobody is safe except for Webb, possibly Doval. Need prospects who are ready in '23.

The Giants don't have anyone (besides Webb) who would provide any meaningful return at the deadline.

Rodon, if healthy and continuing to deal, would get a good return. (Maybe Bret Brady and Matt Allen?) Even as a rental. Put him in Mets rotation with a healthy DeGrom and a healthy Scherzer.

Mets are in win now mode. Cohen doesn’t care what he spends. In addition, I suspect he could work an extension.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - DC 86 - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 05:49 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Now as usual you respond, Go for it pal.

Responses are the basis of an online forum, pal.

(05-22-2022, 05:51 PM)lex24 Wrote:  Rodon, if healthy and continuing to deal, would get a good return.  (Maybe Bret Brady and Matt Allen?) Even as a rental.  Put him in Mets rotation with a healthy DeGrom and a healthy Scherzer.

Brett Baty? you're right, something along those lines would be reasonable for Rodon.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - lex24 - 05-22-2022

(05-22-2022, 07:39 PM)DC 86 Wrote:  
(05-22-2022, 05:49 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Now as usual you respond, Go for it pal.

Responses are the basis of an online forum, pal.

(05-22-2022, 05:51 PM)lex24 Wrote:  Rodon, if healthy and continuing to deal, would get a good return.  (Maybe Bret Brady and Matt Allen?) Even as a rental.  Put him in Mets rotation with a healthy DeGrom and a healthy Scherzer.

Brett Baty? you're right, something along those lines would be reasonable for Rodon.

Yes, autocorrect strikes again.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Mick - 05-22-2022

22-18 overall. 89 game win rate. Better record on the road than at home. 4-6 in their last 10 games. #10 in MLB in OPS, #10 in fielding percentage, #10 in DPs, but #4 in runs scored.  But #24 in ERA and #25 in WHIP.

Hope they pick it up.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - Phogge - 05-22-2022

So are Rabbits.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - OutsiderFan - 05-23-2022

The Pitching was great in April. It's been atrocious in May. I don't even need to look at the stats to know this. It's so obvious just paying attention to the scores this month. But, for the record, the Giants were #3 in MLB with a 2.87 team ERA in April. They are dead last at #30 with a ghastly 5.39 ERA in May,  They've fallen 22 spots in MLB Team ERA 22 days, one for each of the 22 days days of the month so far.

Teams are hitting...

.386 vs. DeSclafani
.303 vs. Wood
.286 vs. Cobb
.258 vs. Webb
.216 vs. Rodon

No starter has a sub 3 ERA and only two are sub 4. Only two under 4, Webb (6) and Rodon (5), have pitched a quality start. The Giants now have a worse team ERA than the freaking Texas Rangers.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - lex24 - 05-23-2022

Slater on the IL.  Wrist.  Stuart Fairchild called up.  With a name like that he should be a Shakespearean actor. 

Slater just can’t stay healthy.  And his injuries seem to occur when he gets going offensively.


RE: 2022 Giants thread - DC 86 - 05-24-2022

Kyle Harrison promoted to Richmond (AA) today.