Re: Prediction game cumulative standings -
BostonCard - 11-03-2016
I figured out the problem. You have two entries for UW, 28-27 and 27-23, which were worth 51 and 47 points, respectively. When we ran the pivot table, it added both of them. I'll remove the 27-23 score, so you will be down to 343.
BC
Re: Prediction game cumulative standings -
JJJ - 11-03-2016
(11-03-2016, 01:30 PM)Papa John link Wrote:Hmm, I picked Stanford 28, UW 27 and I earned 98 points for my UW prediction?
You are WAY too honest! 8)
Re: Prediction game cumulative standings -
Card Fan in OR - 11-03-2016
hurlburt88 wrote:
Quote:As I cling doggedly to the first screen. . . barely!
Well, my personal humiliation is that a couple of people are ahead of me without having participated in every game. Perhaps understandable given my uDub prediction. Maybe next time I think we may not win, I'll just go with 0-0. Probably do better with that.
Re: Prediction game cumulative standings -
Papa John - 11-03-2016
(11-03-2016, 03:23 PM)JJJ link Wrote:[quote author=Papa John link=topic=15949.msg178081#msg178081 date=1478205009]
Hmm, I picked Stanford 28, UW 27 and I earned 98 points for my UW prediction?
You are WAY too honest! 8)
[/quote]
It's easy to be honest when there's no money on the line! And sorry for the unintentional deceit, BC.