The CardBoard
A little disappointed in the gameplan - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: A little disappointed in the gameplan (/thread-10678.html)

Pages: 1 2

Re: A little disappointed in the gameplan - fullmetal - 11-15-2015

(11-15-2015, 07:33 AM)donkey687 link Wrote:We only punted once and never turned it over on downs. Our gameplan was fine. Moving the ball was not a problem.

Except when we had to settle for FGs instead of TDs, and then it was a problem.  Also, one might consider that changing centers for the OL jumbo package to be part of the offensive gameplan--that probably contributed directly to the fumbles.  That was a problem.  Anyone have insight into why we'd change centers for that formation?

Re: A little disappointed in the gameplan - Rally - 11-15-2015

(11-15-2015, 09:05 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:[quote author=donkey687 link=topic=13637.msg141785#msg141785 date=1447598038]
We only punted once and never turned it over on downs. Our gameplan was fine. Moving the ball was not a problem.

Except when we had to settle for FGs instead of TDs, and then it was a problem.  Also, one might consider that changing centers for the OL jumbo package to be part of the offensive gameplan--that probably contributed directly to the fumbles.  That was a problem.  Anyone have insight into why we'd change centers for that formation?
[/quote]

We have all year, to get more weight into the line.  Remember, each center had a bad snap leading to a fumble.  Pick your poison.

Re: A little disappointed in the gameplan - fullmetal - 11-15-2015

3rd and 1, line up in shotgun, one back offset with at least 1-2 TEs, have McCaffrey as a decoy for a TE pass down a seam...sigh.  I can only dream.

I wonder if we could ever run that play option pass package.

Re: A little disappointed in the gameplan - BostonCard - 11-15-2015

We've been moving Caspers, who weighs 300 lbs, in place of Schuler, who weighs 285, upon jumbo formations to get a little more mass in there for some time... Since after NW, I believe.  We've never had a fumbled snap on that exchange until the Oregon game, and I'm fairly certain that the first fumbled snap was not in the jumbo formation, so each snapper was guilty of one bad snap.

By the way, typically, the offense recovers aborted snaps at a 75% clip, so we were very unlucky to fail to recover either of the two snaps.  Grrrr.

BC

Re: A little disappointed in the gameplan - Hulk01 - 11-16-2015

Beat Cal.  Beat Notre Dame.  Beat Utah or USC.  Beat Iowa.

Top ten finish, 12-2 season, lots of talent coming back and coming in. 

We can do it.