FWIW - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: FWIW (/thread-10495.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: FWIW (/thread-10495.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: FWIW - amartinsu13 - 11-29-2015
So.. Bryce is due for a 1600 yard season next year?Â
I'm down.
Re: FWIW - FarmBoy - 11-29-2015
Hopefully he can be Voldemort runner up next year...to McCaffrey
Re: FWIW - BostonCard - 11-29-2015
(11-24-2015, 01:05 AM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=fullmetal link=topic=13451.msg143228#msg143228 date=1448305376]
He needs to pick a school with a good OL and inferior competition at that position. Hopefully not one in the Pac-12...
Washington, Vandy, Michigan and c.al are all strong schools, all with rushing in the bottom half of the NCAAs...maybe Duke, at #58. Harvard's stud running back is a senior this year. There could be worse things....
[/quote]
Miles Gaskin just broke the freshman rushing record at UW. I don't think they have a need for a starting running back next year. They are going to be a scary team in a couple years, if not next year.
BC
Re: FWIW - winflop - 11-29-2015
I think if Barry J transfers anywhere next year it will be back home to Okie St. But this all presumes he's going to graduate this year. Anybody know if he's on track for that?
Re: FWIW - washingtonismoney - 11-29-2015
Why do we presume OK State would want him? Or any other power 5 school?
Re: FWIW - winflop - 11-29-2015
(11-29-2015, 09:22 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Why do we presume OK State would want him? Or any other power 5 school?
Because he's good enough to play for many of them. Maybe not the #1 guy, but #2 or for sure #3. Here he's likely to be #4. But I think the bigger question is whether he will even be eligible to graduate transfer. Graduating in four years while playing football or any other varsity sport is really friggin hard.
Re: FWIW - BostonCard - 11-29-2015
(11-29-2015, 09:42 PM)winflop link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=13451.msg144719#msg144719 date=1448857362]
Why do we presume OK State would want him? Or any other power 5 school?
Because he's good enough to play for many of them. Maybe not the #1 guy, but #2 or for sure #3. Here he's likely to be #4. But I think the bigger question is whether he will even be eligible to graduate transfer. Graduating in four years while playing football or any other varsity sport is really friggin hard.
[/quote]
Why would he be number four? Wright is graduating; so if we assume McCaffrey is one and Love is two, Sanders would be #3, unless you think Scarlett or a true freshman would jump him.
BC
Re: FWIW - winflop - 11-29-2015
I think Scarlett would jump him unless Barry J is clearly better. Given how little he played down the stretch, I don't think that will be the case. Scarlett has 4 years of eligibility left, Sanders has 1. I'd bias toward the younger guy unless there was a compelling reason to do otherwise.
I hope he stays, because I never like to see players leave the program no matter who they are. But it wouldn't surprise me if he did.
Re: FWIW - amartinsu13 - 11-29-2015
(11-29-2015, 10:39 PM)winflop link Wrote:I think Scarlett would jump him unless Barry J is clearly better. Given how little he played down the stretch, I don't think that will be the case. Scarlett has 4 years of eligibility left, Sanders has 1. I'd bias toward the younger guy unless there was a compelling reason to do otherwise.
I hope he stays, because I never like to see players leave the program no matter who they are. But it wouldn't surprise me if he did.
We both know Shaw doesn't bias toward the younger guys... or else guys like Rollins Stallworth wouldn't see the field above highly-touted prospects like Trent Irwin or IBS.
Also given how we don't know anything about Scarlett at the college level, hard to say he would jump Barry J.
For all we know, Scarlett could have blocking issues like Barry J did his early years.
Let's just wait till spring ball!
Re: FWIW - washingtonismoney - 11-30-2015
I don't think the issue is blocking for Barry. Sanders is simply not terribly effective* as a runner.
* (his average yards-per-carry is deceiving, as it's been run up against Arizona and Oregon State. Against other teams he doesn't see the field, let alone perform effectively.)
Re: FWIW - terry - 11-30-2015
Barry Sanders' statistics so far this year -- 48 carries, 312 yards, 6.5 yards/attempt, 4 TDs.
His career statistics -- 112 carries, 669 yards, 6.0 yards/attempt, 5 TDs.
Those numbers might get him an offer elsewhere, if he decides to look around.
He won't play much at Stanford next season, barring an injury to McCaffrey or Love.
As a point of comparison, Kelsey Young went to Boise State looking for more playing time. He didn't win the starting job, but he did get more playing time than he would have had at Stanford. He is Boise State's second leading rusher with 91 carries, 457 yards, 5.0 yards/attempt, 7 TDs. So he found a bigger role for a lower-profile, less successful team, and he got to go to school in Boise for a year.