Week 5 in opponents - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Week 5 in opponents (/thread-10078.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Week 5 in opponents (/thread-10078.html)
Re: Week 5 in opponents - Mick - 10-03-2015
(10-03-2015, 02:27 PM)JJJ link Wrote:Wazzu 21-7 now on QB run with a little push from his teammates, not called. Almost half time.
This is one of my stupid little pet peeves. It never, EVER gets called.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - CornFed - 10-03-2015
EVER!
Another one that bugs me is PI on an uncatchable throw. Haven't seen that not called in what seems like years.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
A certain Bruins QB just gave up a dumb safety through an intentional grounding call. 2:14 left in the first quarter, 2-0 ASU.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
The ASU returner takes the ensuing drop kick to ... maybe the Bruin 30?
Re: Week 5 in opponents - CompSci87 - 10-03-2015
(10-03-2015, 04:58 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=JJJ link=topic=13024.msg132251#msg132251 date=1443907663]
Wazzu 21-7 now on QB run with a little push from his teammates, not called. Almost half time.
This is one of my stupid little pet peeves. It never, EVER gets called.
[/quote]
The announcers today were ranting about that not being called. But it's never called and might as well be dropped from the rule book. When I was a kid back in the 60's I had a book called "Football Rules in Pictures," with drawings of violations and the referees' signals for them. The signal for "pushing, crawling, or helping the runner" caught my eye and I was on the lookout for it. I'm still waiting to see it called after almost 50 years of watching football.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - BostonCard - 10-03-2015
(10-03-2015, 04:58 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=JJJ link=topic=13024.msg132251#msg132251 date=1443907663]
Wazzu 21-7 now on QB run with a little push from his teammates, not called. Almost half time.
This is one of my stupid little pet peeves. It never, EVER gets called.
[/quote]
There is a good reason it never, EVER gets called any more; it's not a penalty.
https://daallen.wordpress.com/2014/12/07/football-helping-the-ball-carrier/
It is not legal to grasp, pull or lift the ball carrier, but it is not illegal to push.
Quote:In trying to gain yardage, ball carrier A44 is slowed by defensive
players attempting to make the tackle. Back A22 (a) puts his hands
on the buttocks of A44 and pushes him forward; (b) pushes the pile of
teammates who begin to surround A44; © grabs the arm of A44 and
tries to pull him forward for more yardage.
RULING
(a) and (b) Legal.
It is not a foul to push the ball carrier or the pile.
© Foul for assisting the runner. 5-yard penalty with three-and-one enforcement. (Rule 9-3-
2-b)
BC
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
ASU up 9-0 now.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
First play from scrimmage, Clemson's hyper-athletic QB streaks for a 40,50 yard run.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
Clemson punches it in, 7-0.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - Roberton3 - 10-03-2015
(10-03-2015, 05:14 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:The signal for "pushing, crawling, or helping the runner" caught my eye and I was on the lookout for it. I'm still waiting to see it called after almost 50 years of watching football.
I've seen that called. It was against the Chicago B.ears, in 1985, I think. It was one of those goal-line plays where the B.ears sent Refrigerator Perry in to block, and after Walter Payton was initially stopped (but not yet down), the Refrigerator grabbed him and threw him into the end zone.
(Actually, now that I think about it, they may have called him for illegal use of hands rather than helping the ball carrier. I can't remember for sure.)
Re: Week 5 in opponents - BostonCard - 10-03-2015
https://twitter.com/FauxPelini/status/650419053962637312
Maybe a future opponent.
BC
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
On one hand, N.D.'s offensive line didn't look great on its first three-and-out. On the other, Kizer had an incredible effort to dodge three would-be sackers on third-and-fifteen.
(Then their punter shanked a fifteen yard punt.)
Re: Week 5 in opponents - CompSci87 - 10-03-2015
(10-03-2015, 05:15 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=Mick link=topic=13024.msg132280#msg132280 date=1443916736]
[quote author=JJJ link=topic=13024.msg132251#msg132251 date=1443907663]
Wazzu 21-7 now on QB run with a little push from his teammates, not called. Almost half time.
This is one of my stupid little pet peeves. It never, EVER gets called.
[/quote]
There is a good reason it never, EVER gets called any more; it's not a penalty.
https://daallen.wordpress.com/2014/12/07/football-helping-the-ball-carrier/
It is not legal to grasp, pull or lift the ball carrier, but it is not illegal to push.
Quote:In trying to gain yardage, ball carrier A44 is slowed by defensive
players attempting to make the tackle. Back A22 (a) puts his hands
on the buttocks of A44 and pushes him forward; (b) pushes the pile of
teammates who begin to surround A44; © grabs the arm of A44 and
tries to pull him forward for more yardage.
RULING
(a) and (b) Legal.
It is not a foul to push the ball carrier or the pile.
© Foul for assisting the runner. 5-yard penalty with three-and-one enforcement. (Rule 9-3-
2-b)
BC
[/quote]
Thanks, BC. If my old rule picture book was correct, it seems the "pushing" part of the rule must have been dropped at some point.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
Rosen missed a very easy pass on 3rd-and-2, as the commentator notes the up-and-downs of having a true freshman QB.
Clemson is continuing to move the ball on N.D.'s defense. As ever, ND DC Brian Van Gorder is addicted to blitzing at the expense of good sense.
Now Clemson's up 14-0 as two Irish DBs clang into a Clemson WR. The WR stays standing, then runs into the endzon
Re: Week 5 in opponents - BostonCard - 10-03-2015
(10-03-2015, 05:36 PM)CompSci87 link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=13024.msg132295#msg132295 date=1443917744]
[quote author=Mick link=topic=13024.msg132280#msg132280 date=1443916736]
[quote author=JJJ link=topic=13024.msg132251#msg132251 date=1443907663]
Wazzu 21-7 now on QB run with a little push from his teammates, not called. Almost half time.
This is one of my stupid little pet peeves. It never, EVER gets called.
[/quote]
There is a good reason it never, EVER gets called any more; it's not a penalty.
https://daallen.wordpress.com/2014/12/07/football-helping-the-ball-carrier/
It is not legal to grasp, pull or lift the ball carrier, but it is not illegal to push.
Quote:In trying to gain yardage, ball carrier A44 is slowed by defensive
players attempting to make the tackle. Back A22 (a) puts his hands
on the buttocks of A44 and pushes him forward; (b) pushes the pile of
teammates who begin to surround A44; © grabs the arm of A44 and
tries to pull him forward for more yardage.
RULING
(a) and (b) Legal.
It is not a foul to push the ball carrier or the pile.
© Foul for assisting the runner. 5-yard penalty with three-and-one enforcement. (Rule 9-3-
2-b)
BC
[/quote]
Thanks, BC. If my old rule picture book was correct, it seems the "pushing" part of the rule must have been dropped at some point.
[/quote]
I think it was ditched after the infamous Bush Push.
BC
Re: Week 5 in opponents - BostonCard - 10-03-2015
Not an opponent, BUT... #3 Ole Miss is getting its butt kicked by Florida. 25-0. Hard to believe this is the same team that beat Alabama, who today kicked Georgia's butt.
BC
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
Kizer dodges another sack and sprints for 26 yards. Given the sometimes-sorry state of our tackling, put this down as a worry.
And now Brian Kelly is yelling at some hapless player.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
ASU up 15-7.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - washingtonismoney - 10-03-2015
N.D. took two delay of games before running a game...and we're seeing peak Brian Kelly exasperation.
Re: Week 5 in opponents - BostonCard - 10-03-2015
(10-03-2015, 06:16 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:N.D. took two delay of games before running a game...and we're seeing peak Brian Kelly exasperation.
Imagine if Shaw did that.
By the way, is it "delay of games" or "delays of game"? "Delay of games" implies that a brobdingnagian snowstorm delayed the start of multiple games at one part. "Delays of game" implies that two penalties delayed the same game. But I never knew the rule and "delay of games" sounds more correct.
BC