The CardBoard
Stanford Baseball TO THE CWS! - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford Baseball TO THE CWS! (/thread-22824.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

RE: Stanford Baseball - ca245 - 04-16-2022

Could someone knowledgeable on the rules explain the ruling on the play in the 6th inning, just before Bowser's home run, when the UCLA catcher tried to throw the ball to third base trying to catch the runner trying to steal the base, but the throw hit Bowser's bat while he was standing in the batter's box, allowing the runner to score. The announcers seemed sure it was interference, but the call was no interference.

RE: Stanford Baseball - TonyLima - 04-16-2022

H
(04-16-2022, 09:36 PM)ca245 Wrote:  Could someone knowledgeable on the rules explain the ruling on the play in the 6th inning, just before Bowser's home run, when the UCLA catcher tried to throw the ball to third base trying to catch the runner trying to steal the base, but the throw hit Bowser's bat while he was standing in the batter's box, allowing the runner to score. The announcers seemed sure it was interference, but the call was no interference.

Pretty sure the batter has the right to stay put.
(04-16-2022, 07:27 PM)BobK Wrote:  And now 1/2 game out of first

RAH!

RE: Stanford Baseball - Spiny_Norman - 04-17-2022

(04-16-2022, 09:36 PM)ca245 Wrote:  Could someone knowledgeable on the rules explain the ruling on the play in the 6th inning, just before Bowser's home run, when the UCLA catcher tried to throw the ball to third base trying to catch the runner trying to steal the base, but the throw hit Bowser's bat while he was standing in the batter's box, allowing the runner to score. The announcers seemed sure it was interference, but the call was no interference.

Rule 6.03 (a) (3) - A batter is out for illegal action when he interferes with the catcher’s fielding or throwing by stepping out of the batter’s box or making any other movement that hinders the catcher’s play at home base.

Bowser was a statue on that play. He was still. I guess the home plate umpire determined that Bowser had made no movement that could be judged as interference.

RE: Stanford Baseball - ca245 - 04-17-2022

That’s what I thought, but the announcers kept saying “ I don’t see how that isn’t interference.” The only issue with the ups seemed to be whether the rubber on first was entitled to go all the way to third.

RE: Stanford Baseball - BostonCard - 04-17-2022

(04-17-2022, 07:00 AM)ca245 Wrote:  That’s what I thought, but the announcers kept saying “ I don’t see how that isn’t interference.” The only issue with the ups seemed to be whether the rubber on first was entitled to go all the way to third.

Man, there is definitely a NSFW joke that could be made with that typo/autocorrect.

BC

RE: Stanford Baseball - CowboyIndian - 04-17-2022

(04-17-2022, 07:00 AM)ca245 Wrote:  That’s what I thought, but the announcers kept saying “ I don’t see how that isn’t interference.” The only issue with the ups seemed to be whether the rubber on first was entitled to go all the way to third.

Rubbers usually end up going beyond third. That's my experience, anyway.

RE: Stanford Baseball - TonyLima - 04-17-2022

(04-17-2022, 12:21 AM)Spiny_Norman Wrote:  
(04-16-2022, 09:36 PM)ca245 Wrote:  Could someone knowledgeable on the rules explain the ruling on the play in the 6th inning, just before Bowser's home run, when the UCLA catcher tried to throw the ball to third base trying to catch the runner trying to steal the base, but the throw hit Bowser's bat while he was standing in the batter's box, allowing the runner to score. The announcers seemed sure it was interference, but the call was no interference.

Rule 6.03 (a) (3) - A batter is out for illegal action when he interferes with the catcher’s fielding or throwing by stepping out of the batter’s box or making any other movement that hinders the catcher’s play at home base.

Bowser was a statue on that play. He was still. I guess the home plate umpire determined that Bowser had made no movement that could be judged as interference.

TYVM! Actual information.

RE: Stanford Baseball - Maple Leaf - 04-17-2022

(04-17-2022, 11:56 AM)CowboyIndian Wrote:  
(04-17-2022, 07:00 AM)ca245 Wrote:  That’s what I thought, but the announcers kept saying “ I don’t see how that isn’t interference.” The only issue with the ups seemed to be whether the rubber on first was entitled to go all the way to third.

Rubbers usually end up going beyond third. That's my experience, anyway.

but rubbers have been known failing to score when thrown out at home.

RE: Stanford Baseball - BobK - 04-18-2022

First new rankings and Stanford up to 7
Up to 6 in another. RPI now 21

RE: Stanford Baseball - TonyLima - 04-18-2022

D1 Baseball has Stanford at 7 this week. Nice writeup, too.

[Image: 56a914a1-2fdd-4300-aa95-6e344f30bd3a]

Spike - Spike - 04-18-2022

It’s not too early to book your lodging in Scottsdale for the inaugural Pac-12 baseball tournament, May 25-29

RE: Stanford Baseball - Madera86 - 04-19-2022

Still looking for someone, anyone, who can pitch the mid-week game. Although we did get 2 1/3 scoreless innings from Jensen.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry. At one point, we led this game 9-1. It'a now 10-6, and O'Rourke has put the first three batters on base, the last two by plunking them.

RE: Stanford Baseball - BostonCard - 04-19-2022

[tweet]https://twitter.com/stanfordbsb/status/1516633437876088834?s=21&t=ucY82RIk7wd7kMjNE9umtQ[/tweet]

BC

RE: Stanford Baseball - Madera86 - 04-19-2022

Let's talk about Bruno! He strikes out the side to slam the door shut in the ninth. Stanford wins a wild game, 10-8.

RE: Stanford Baseball - TonyLima - 04-19-2022

Any idea how to watch this weekend’s games?

RE: Stanford Baseball - BobK - 04-20-2022

Baseball America projects Stanford to host a regional

RE: Stanford Baseball - Spiny_Norman - 04-22-2022

Stanford defeated Grand Canyon U 11-1 today in the first of 4 weekend games. Williams pitched 8 innings and gave up 7 hits and 1 run. Montgomery hit 2 more HRs.

Stanford is in the middle of 11 consecutive road games. They are 4-1 so far.

Stanford plays a DH tomorrow vs. GCU at 1 pm and then vs. San Diego St at 6 pm. The weekend wraps up vs. SDSU on Sunday.

RE: Stanford Baseball - TonyLima - 04-22-2022

(04-22-2022, 04:04 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote:  Stanford defeated Grand Canyon U 11-1 today in the first of 4 weekend games. Williams pitched 8 innings and gave up 7 hits and 1 run. Montgomery hit 2 more HRs.

Stanford is in the middle of 11 consecutive road games. They are 4-1 so far.

Stanford plays a DH tomorrow vs. GCU at 1 pm and then vs. San Diego St at 6 pm. The weekend wraps up vs. SDSU on Sunday.

SDSU games have a radio broadcast. Follow the link from the schedule at GoStanford.com.

RE: Stanford Baseball - Madera86 - 04-23-2022

Does everyone in the bullpen have the yips?

RE: Stanford Baseball - TonyLima - 04-24-2022

(04-23-2022, 09:22 PM)Madera86 Wrote:  Does everyone in the bullpen have the yips?

Depends on how you count Mathews.